- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 10:50:35 +0100
- To: "'Ivan Herman'" <ivan@w3.org>, "'Pat Hayes'" <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: "'Guus Schreiber'" <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, "'RDF WG'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 6:56 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > As Antoine notes, the OWL 2 group has faced the same issue for OWL 2 > RL. I do not see any problem doing that in this case either. I do not > think we should reopen, at this point, the bnode-in-predicate and > literal-in-subject issue and, with this, using this 'generalized > triples for the rules' seems to be the clean approach... Honestly it sounds a bit strange to me to simply accept that there is a fundamental problem without trying to address it - especially considering that the problem has been known since at least 2005 (2002?). The other thing that worries me even more is the fact that a number of RDF serialization formats are in the process of being standardized right now. At least JSON-LD doesn't have this artificial restriction but that was heavily criticized by the RDF WG and, as it seems at the moment, we will have to introduce it. I think there won't be a better point in time to fix this once for all. Thanks, Markus
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 09:51:07 UTC