Wednesday, 28 November 2012
- review of RDF Concepts
- Minutes for 28 November
- Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon
- Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon
- Late
- Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon
- Review of rdf11-concepts ED
- RE: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon
Tuesday, 27 November 2012
- Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon
- Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon
- Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon
- Re: [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon
- [ALL] agenda 28 Nov telecon
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 27th 2012
- Review of JSON-LD API by WebIDL/JavaScript API expert
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-11-20
Sunday, 25 November 2012
Saturday, 24 November 2012
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107)
Friday, 23 November 2012
Thursday, 22 November 2012
Monday, 19 November 2012
Thursday, 22 November 2012
- Re: Possible test case for turtle?
- Re: Possible test case for turtle?
- Re: Possible test case for turtle?
- Possible test case for turtle?
- Re: 1.5 RDF and Change Over Time
- Re: A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: 1.5 RDF and Change Over Time
- Re: A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: 1.5 RDF and Change Over Time
- Re: 1.5 RDF and Change Over Time
Wednesday, 21 November 2012
- A different take on b-scopes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: 1.5 RDF and Change Over Time
- 1.5 RDF and Change Over Time
- RDF Concepts draft ready; overview of open issues
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Use http://www.w3.org/ns/json-ld#context instead of describedby link relation
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- regrets for the telecon
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
Tuesday, 20 November 2012
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ?g-box?? [RDF Concepts]
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 20th 2012
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-11-13
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
Monday, 19 November 2012
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle
- Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle
Sunday, 18 November 2012
- Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle
- Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle
- Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle
- Re: Rollup EARL report for Turtle
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
Saturday, 17 November 2012
- Rollup EARL report for Turtle
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
Friday, 16 November 2012
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- [All] Agenda for 21 Nov
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-111 (dataset-operations): Should RDF Concepts define any operations on RDF datasets? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Fwd: Turtle tests : Case-sensitivity of base and prefix directives
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
Thursday, 15 November 2012
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Factoring of entailment regimes (was: Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?)
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: B-scopes
- Turtle test suite -- actions completed
Wednesday, 14 November 2012
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: B-scopes
- RE: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- RE: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: B-scopes
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-111 (dataset-operations): Should RDF Concepts define any operations on RDF datasets? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: B-scopes
- B-scopes
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
Tuesday, 13 November 2012
- Intent to close ISSUE-166
- Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 13th 2012
- RE: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 13th 2012
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 13th 2012
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-108 (xsd-valuespaces): Semantics should reference "XML Schema Datatypes in RDF and OWL" [RDF Semantics]
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
Monday, 12 November 2012
- No Telecon Wednesday due to ISWC
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-108 (xsd-valuespaces): Semantics should reference "XML Schema Datatypes in RDF and OWL" [RDF Semantics]
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-111 (dataset-operations): Should RDF Concepts define any operations on RDF datasets? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: [Concepts] Proposing some informative Notes for deletion
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-108 (xsd-valuespaces): Semantics should reference "XML Schema Datatypes in RDF and OWL" [RDF Semantics]
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
Sunday, 11 November 2012
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Turtle - Collections Example sanity check
Saturday, 10 November 2012
- Re: Where is the Turtle editor's draft?
- Re: Where is the Turtle editor's draft?
- Re: Where is the Turtle editor's draft?
- Re: OWL2/RIF's rdf:PlainLiteral proposed edited rec
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Where is the Turtle editor's draft?
- Re: OWL2/RIF's rdf:PlainLiteral proposed edited rec
- Re: OWL2/RIF's rdf:PlainLiteral proposed edited rec
- OWL2/RIF's rdf:PlainLiteral proposed edited rec
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: Intent to close issues 125 and 192
- Intent to close issues 125 and 192
Friday, 9 November 2012
- Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts
- Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- RDF-ISSUE-111 (dataset-operations): Should RDF Concepts define any operations on RDF datasets? [RDF Concepts]
- [Concepts] Editorial changes to Blank Nodes (ISSUE-107)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- [Concepts] Proposing some informative Notes for deletion
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as “g-box”? [RDF Concepts]
- RDF-ISSUE-110 (g-box): A proper term for the concept formerly known as ??g-box??? [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- RDF-ISSUE-109 (ill-typed-so-what): What's the consequence of a literal being ill-typed? [RDF Concepts]
- Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists)
- RDF-ISSUE-108 (xsd-valuespaces): Semantics should reference "XML Schema Datatypes in RDF and OWL" [RDF Semantics]
Thursday, 8 November 2012
- Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?
- Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts
- Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts
- Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts
- Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts
- Re: New abstract for RDF Concepts
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
Wednesday, 7 November 2012
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-107 (blank-node-definition): Definition of blank nodes (editorial-ish) [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-105 (datasets-webarch): Graphs, datasets, authoritative representations, and content negotiation [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-106 (concepts-and-semantics): Relationship between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts]
- [ALL] Minutes of November 7 2012
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-105 (datasets-webarch): Graphs, datasets, authoritative representations, and content negotiation [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-106 (concepts-and-semantics): Relationship between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts]
- New abstract for RDF Concepts
- RDF-ISSUE-107 (blank-node-definition): Definition of blank nodes (editorial-ish) [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-106 (concepts-and-semantics): Relationship between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts]
- RDF-ISSUE-106 (concepts-and-semantics): Relationship between RDF Concepts and RDF Semantics [RDF Concepts]
- Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 7 Nov
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- RDF-ISSUE-105 (datasets-webarch): Graphs, datasets, authoritative representations, and content negotiation [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- Re: ISSUE-97: propose to close the issue by doing nothing
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- RE: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- Re: Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests
- Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready
Tuesday, 6 November 2012
- Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready
- Re: rdf11-concepts WD ready
- Re: Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- RDF-ISSUE-104 (concept-notes): Too many informative Notes in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Added a Note on XML Schema and OWL2 custom datatypes to Concepts; close ISSUE-96?
- Disimproved definition of literals in Concepts; close ISSUE-94?
- Re: ISSUE-97: propose to close the issue by doing nothing
- Re: ISSUE-84: proposed solution
- Re: Added a Note on XML Schema and OWL2 custom datatypes to Concepts; close ISSUE-96?
- JSON-LD Telecon Minutes for 2012-11-06
- Added a Note on XML Schema and OWL2 custom datatypes to Concepts; close ISSUE-96?
- Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 7 Nov
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- ISSUE-97: propose to close the issue by doing nothing
- ISSUE-84: proposed solution
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Some informative edits in the Concepts ED
- Re: [ALL] agenda telecon 7 Nov
- RE: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Some informative edits in the Concepts ED
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- [ALL] agenda telecon 7 Nov
- Re: Some informative edits in the Concepts ED
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- ISSUE-85: Update RDF Semantics to distinguish between the identity of values and the (numeric) equality of values to be in line with XSD 1.1
- RE: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- RE: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Some informative edits in the Concepts ED
- Re: Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests
Monday, 5 November 2012
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 6th 2012
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests
- Re: Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 6th 2012
- Agenda: JSON-LD Telecon - Tuesday, November 6th 2012
- Re: Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests
- Re: Turtle Bad IRI syntax tests
Sunday, 4 November 2012
Saturday, 3 November 2012
Friday, 2 November 2012
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
Thursday, 1 November 2012
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- RE: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- RDF-ISSUE-103 (dereferenceable-iris): Make dereferenceable IRIs a SHOULD in RDF Concepts [RDF Concepts]
- RE: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- RE: Sloppy inference rules
- Re: Turtle syn-prefix-06.ttl problem
- Re: Moving rdf:Seq and friends to RDF/XML (was: Re: Minutes of RDF-WG F2F, Day 2)
- Re: Sloppy inference rules
- Turtle syn-prefix-06.ttl problem