On 2012-11-01, at 09:50, Markus Lanthaler wrote: > On Thursday, November 01, 2012 6:56 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > >> As Antoine notes, the OWL 2 group has faced the same issue for OWL 2 >> RL. I do not see any problem doing that in this case either. I do not >> think we should reopen, at this point, the bnode-in-predicate and >> literal-in-subject issue and, with this, using this 'generalized >> triples for the rules' seems to be the clean approach... > > Honestly it sounds a bit strange to me to simply accept that there is a > fundamental problem without trying to address it - especially considering > that the problem has been known since at least 2005 (2002?). > The other thing that worries me even more is the fact that a number of RDF > serialization formats are in the process of being standardized right now. At > least JSON-LD doesn't have this artificial restriction but that was heavily > criticized by the RDF WG and, as it seems at the moment, we will have to > introduce it. > > I think there won't be a better point in time to fix this once for all. It is a matter of opinion that there is anything broken, to "fix". - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian +44 7854 417 874 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 80 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5JLReceived on Monday, 5 November 2012 12:16:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:22 UTC