Re: Sloppy inference rules

On Nov 1, 2012, at 6:55, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> The idea would be that inference could be done by applying the rules to exhaustion, then throwing away any triple that isn't RDF legal.

Certainly. This is consistent with RDF and is equivalent to recognizing that the extraneous triples are a mathematical artifact of the production.  It is also consistent with my suggestion that JSON-LD state in their spec that there may be valid JSON syntax that is not valid JSON-LD.

There needs to be a "fix" here, but it is an easy one not a major rewrite.

Regards,
Dave

Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 10:17:37 UTC