Proposal to resolve ISSUE-102 (well-formed lists) from Richard Cyganiak on 2012-11-09 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from November 2012)

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:48:17 +0000
To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <24B8BA79-A825-435A-B387-F8A574A44BE3@cyganiak.de>

ISSUE-102: Shall we highlight Turtle's list structures as "Well-Formed Lists" in one of our Recs?
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/102


PROPOSAL: Define the concept “well-formed list” in detail in RDF Schema, including a nice diagram. State that any use of terms from the collections vocabulary SHOULD be part of a well-formed list. Update Semantics to remove discussion of collections in 3.3.3. Update Turtle and RDF/XML to refer to well-formed lists when introducing the respective syntax shorthands. Send an email to OWL WG comments list informing them of this and suggest that future versions of OWL do the same.

Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 08:48:47 UTC