- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 17:46:23 +0100
- To: "'Richard Cyganiak'" <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: "'RDF Working Group'" <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
> On 6 Nov 2012, at 15:02, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > > I think you misunderstand the purpose of RDF Concepts. > > It defines a data model that is the shared foundation for a number of > other specifications, including RDF syntaxes, query languages, formal > semantics, vocabulary definition languages, and so forth. Well. It depends on how you look at it. The data model defines how the actual data ends up looking. Therefore I thought (and still think) that this would be the right place for such a recommendation. On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 4:14 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > > On 6 Nov 2012, at 15:02, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > > I think you misunderstand the purpose of RDF Concepts. > > (By saying that, I meant that there's a bigger picture that needs to be > considered; I didn't mean to be dismissive, apologies if it sounded > that way.) No worries! I see your point and +1 your proposal to close ISSUE-103. Thanks, Markus -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2012 16:50:23 UTC