- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:23:23 +0000
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 30 Oct 2012, at 16:15, Pat Hayes wrote: >> So my question to the WG is, how disastrous would it be if the RDFS inference rules were stated in terms of a 'sloppy' version of RDF with the syntactic restrictions removed, i.e. with the following grammar for triples? >> >> triple ::= term term term . >> term ::= IRI | blanknode | literal > > +1 +1
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 11:24:31 UTC