- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 03:24:51 -0600
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:48 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > ISSUE-102: Shall we highlight Turtle's list structures as "Well-Formed Lists" in one of our Recs? > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/102 > > > PROPOSAL: Define the concept “well-formed list” in detail in RDF Schema, including a nice diagram. +1 > State that any use of terms from the collections vocabulary SHOULD be part of a well-formed list. -1. This is too strong. Subgraphs of a WFL graph need not be WFL, for example. For some purposes, all one needs to know is that some item is in the list somewhere: we should not make it illegal to have graphs saying just this. > Update Semantics to remove discussion of collections in 3.3.3. If this just means moving this stuff from Semantics to Concepts, then +1. Pat > Update Turtle and RDF/XML to refer to well-formed lists when introducing the respective syntax shorthands. Send an email to OWL WG comments list informing them of this and suggest that future versions of OWL do the same. > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 09:25:28 UTC