- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:00:30 +0000
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 21 Nov 2012, at 20:45, Nathan wrote: >> Would it be possible to change the word "container" to "provider", personally I feel it reads and conveys better. >> >> - "We informally use the term RDF source to refer to a persistent yet mutable source or container of RDF graphs." >> + "We informally use the term RDF source to refer to a persistent yet mutable source or provider of RDF graphs." > > I'd like to keep “container” here to leave the definition broader. > > How about replacing “source” with “provider”? They are near synonyms, and “source” is already in the defined term itself. "mutable RDF graph container or source" may do it?
Received on Thursday, 22 November 2012 11:01:10 UTC