Re: Ill-typed vs. inconsistent?

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>wrote:

> > The more I think of this issue, the more I believe that ill-typed
> literals should be a syntax error. An application that supports a datatype
> should reject RDF graphs that do not write literals of that type properly.
>

Not possible unless we are requiring that every parser implement all of
XSD, since custom datatypes would need to be parsed as well. Would also not
be implemented as it's useful to preserve the "ill-typed" literals as
having them doesn't render everything in that file totally useless.

--Gavin

Received on Thursday, 15 November 2012 20:14:55 UTC