Re: ISSUE-97: propose to close the issue by doing nothing

On Nov 6, 2012, at 15:11 , Pat Hayes wrote:

> 
> On Nov 6, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> 
>> Re. ISSUE-97: Should the semantics of RDF graphs be dependent on a vocabulary?
>> 
>> 
>> I suggest we close it and do nothing.
> 
> I agree. I was keen on this idea for a while, until I started to go into the details of the effects it would have. Thanks for hewing a similar path.

+1

Ivan

> 
> Pat
> 
>> 
>> 
>> The implications of the change would be important.
>> If such a thing was done, all reasoners would have to be reimplemented, because the change adds a lot of entailments inferred from the empty graph.
>> 
>> Nonetheless, I made a wiki page where I put the formal definitions of simple-entailment, lv-entailment, rdf-entailment, rdfs-entailment and D-entailment when these notions are made independent from a vocabulary.
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/User:Azimmerm/RDF-semantics
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> -- 
>> Antoine Zimmermann
>> ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol
>> École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne
>> 158 cours Fauriel
>> 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2
>> France
>> Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03
>> Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66
>> http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
>> 
>> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
> 40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
> Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
> FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
> phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 13:11:46 UTC