W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Sloppy inference rules

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:57:45 +0000
Message-ID: <5093A729.7040202@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org

On 01/11/12 10:17, David Wood wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2012, at 6:55, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>> The idea would be that inference could be done by applying the rules to exhaustion, then throwing away any triple that isn't RDF legal.
> Certainly. This is consistent with RDF and is equivalent to recognizing that the extraneous triples are a mathematical artifact of the production.  It is also consistent with my suggestion that JSON-LD state in their spec that there may be valid JSON syntax that is not valid JSON-LD.
> There needs to be a "fix" here, but it is an easy one not a major rewrite.
> Regards,
> Dave


Or should that be "+i"

Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 10:58:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:22 UTC