W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: B-scopes

From: Alex Hall <alexhall@revelytix.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:28:26 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFq2biz2zhtbXUFUubbR7g6S7Kqihja2qhGztfPBZK7P6NRjmw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>wrote:

> On 14 Nov 2012, at 11:32, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> > I have no idea what a "blank node scope" is.
> Here's another attempt at phrasing. It still avoids a proper definition
> for “scope”, but perhaps does so in a less jarring way. It actually does
> away again with the b-scope term, and just uses “scope” or “scope for blank
> nodes”:
> [[
> A *blank node identifier* is a Unicode string that is not an IRI.

Minor nit-pick: An IRI is just a Unicode string that follows a certain
format. A blank-node identifier string could be a valid IRI (modulo the
syntax rules for bnode labels in the serialization language) in the same
sense that a literal string could also be a valid IRI. We just choose to
treat blank node labels and IRIs as distinct types of things.

Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 16:29:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:23 UTC