Re: Sloppy inference rules

On 11/07/2012 09:13 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 7 Nov 2012, at 13:29, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> I would also like to see two things added to the note:
>>
>> - drawing attention on the fact that these triples go beyond RDF triples, and they are there for the purpose of getting the rules working
> Let's be precise: They are there to make the *presentation* of the rules *simpler*.
>
> If it was just about making the rules *work*, there would be ways of achieving this that don't involve a generalized version of RDF graphs. But that would end up being more awkward.
>
> Best,
> Richard
>
>
>
+1

peter

Received on Thursday, 8 November 2012 06:39:15 UTC