- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 01:38:43 -0500
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 11/07/2012 09:13 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 7 Nov 2012, at 13:29, Ivan Herman wrote: >> I would also like to see two things added to the note: >> >> - drawing attention on the fact that these triples go beyond RDF triples, and they are there for the purpose of getting the rules working > Let's be precise: They are there to make the *presentation* of the rules *simpler*. > > If it was just about making the rules *work*, there would be ways of achieving this that don't involve a generalized version of RDF graphs. But that would end up being more awkward. > > Best, > Richard > > > +1 peter
Received on Thursday, 8 November 2012 06:39:15 UTC