- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:20:05 -0800
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Richard Many thanks. I like it. I added a sentence to the wiki, regarding copying: "If the source and target scopes are different, and the blank node identifiers do not occur elsewhere in either scope, this can be achieved by simply using the same blank node identifiers in both graphs." Pat On Nov 14, 2012, at 3:02 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > Following recent discussions, I've written up a proposal to change the design of blank nodes in RDF by explicitly introducing scoped blank node identifiers into the abstract syntax. > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/User:Rcygania2/B-Scopes > > Requirements: > > • Consistency with all resolutions the WG has made so far > • No changes to other specs beyond Concepts and Semantics required Actually I don't think any changes to Semantics are required. At most, small editorial re-wordings. > • No changes to conforming implementations required > > All further details are in the wiki. > > Comments welcome. > > Best, > Richard > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2012 17:20:44 UTC