UFDTF Meeting this monday 2008-06-02 (off-week)
Re: Question about the topProperty
ISSUE-129 (rdf:list vocabulary): Desirable to have rdf:list vocabulary available for use in modeling in OWL 2
[UFDTF] update of UFDTF wiki space and creation of Reqs doc work area
DL-Syntax document: editorial bug
Question about problems with top/bottom property
"Should" sanity check
Re: F2F3 survey -- per person or per organization?
regrets and a few comments on versioning/imports
- Re: regrets and a few comments on versioning/imports
- Re: regrets and a few comments on versioning/imports
bye for now
functional style syntax
RDF Reification for annotations and negative property assertions
Issue-111 another angle and questions
ISSUE-128 (MAY/SHOULD/MUST): Normative documents should pass a MAY/SHOULD/MUST sanity check
issue-21 / importing multiple versions of the same ontology
Requirement for ontology header
reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger
- RE: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger
- Re: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger
reification/annotations
rdf:list vocabulary
Agenda for teleconference 2008-05-28
ACTION-150
Minutes 21/05/2008
No UFDTF Meeting monday due to holidays in US and UK
ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial]
- RE: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial]
- Re: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial]
RE: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111)
Table/spec accessibility
Easy Keys text
ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited
I18N issues an OWL2
Re: owl:intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111)
[ACTION-147] Delay in review of RDF mapping document
Agenda for teleconf 21st May 2008
CfP OWLED 2008
Re: [FULL] ISSUE-119: the other approach
Ontology locations: OntologyURI vs. xml:base and namespaces (ISSUE-21)
ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom?
- Re: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom?
- RE: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom?
rif:text / owl:internationalizedString
Re: [p4-feedback] [Pellet-users] Protege4 & Pellet compatibility
ACTION-146: HP and n-ary datatypes
I have just implemented the proposed resolution of the imports (related to ISSUE-21)
rif-rdf-owl: OWL WG review
RIF comments
[Full] another minor issue with OWL Full/ rdfs:Datatype vs owl:DataRange
UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST
- Re: UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST
- Re: UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST
- Re: UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST
OWL/XML and GRDDL
Fwd: Last call announcement: CURIEs
Grddl et al
Minutes of yesterday's TC
DL-Lite Profile - new tracking implementation
Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :)
- Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :)
- Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :)
test cases on wiki
IRC log from 2008-04-30 telecon inaccessible
Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest
- Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest
Wiki gone haywire?
ACTION-129 and ACTION-132
RE: Minor bug in http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/rdfs.html#5.2
review of RIF-RDF-OWL
RE: [Imports Task Force] revised imports spec
Agenda for TC 2008-05-07
Understanding n-ary data predicates
syntax for "langed" literals
[Full] another minor bug in OWL1 Full
proposal to close issue-4
ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain
- Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain