- From: Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 18:28:09 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl>
- Cc: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Rinke Hoekstra wrote: > > I personally prefer the two letter variants Same here. +1 for the two letters, as they are sufficiently short and meaningful to the (many) people who know the origin of the profiles. greetings, Carsten , with DLP being the exception to > the rule. And I don't mind the 2. (Basically this is Markus' original > proposal) > > Best, > > Rinke > > > On 21 mei 2008, at 06:25, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > >> A vote for the 1 letter names: >> >> On May 20, 2008, at 6:24 PM, Melanie Courtot wrote: >>> like the proposal with one letter from Bijan at >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Apr/0327.html >>> OWL E >>> OWL D >>> OWL R >>> would maybe modify to OWL2E, OWL2D and OWL2R. >>> >>> I think it's short enough to allow sub flavors like OWL2R-DL and >>> OWL2R-Full. >> >> -Alan >> >> On Apr 28, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Bijan Parsia wrote: >> >>> >>> On 28 Apr 2008, at 17:02, Ian Horrocks wrote: >>>> >>>> OK - but can you suggest some other names? >>> >>> Not really. I personally can live with the current names...I was just >>> trying to report the state of play as I understand it. Nameing these >>> suckers is damn hard, I'm finding. >>> >>> EL++ OWL-Ont >>> DL Lite OWL-Rel (for relational?) >>> OWL-R OWL-Rul >>> >>> These have the advantage of being somewhat consistent and equi-repellent. >>> The disadvantage is that they are very repellent :( >>> >>> I guess we could try single letters across the board: >>> >>> OWL E >>> OWL D >>> OWL R >>> >>> These all potentially scan: >>> >>> OWLy >>> OWLed >>> OWLer >>> >>> But, that sucks too :( >>> >>> One could try modeling names on DLP: >>> >>> OWL EDL (for EL++ DL) >>> OWL RDL (for relational DL) >>> OWL DLP (for description logic programs) >>> >>> Or >>> EON (Existential ONtologies, conflicts with the EON workshop) >>> RON (Relational ONtolgoies, conflicts with people I know) >>> FON (Forwardchaingingrules/Full ONtologies, could be fun) >>> >>> Ok, I got *nothin*. Sorry. I can live with the current names, I guess. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Bijan. >>> >>> >> > > ----------------------------------------------- > Drs. Rinke Hoekstra > > Email: hoekstra@uva.nl Skype: rinkehoekstra > Phone: +31-20-5253499 Fax: +31-20-5253495 > Web: http://www.leibnizcenter.org/users/rinke > > Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law > University of Amsterdam, PO Box 1030 > 1000 BA Amsterdam, The Netherlands > ----------------------------------------------- > > > > -- * Carsten Lutz, Institut f"ur Theoretische Informatik, TU Dresden * * Office phone:++49 351 46339171 mailto:lutz@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de *
Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 16:28:57 UTC