public-owl-wg@w3.org from May 2008 by date

Friday, 30 May 2008

• Re: UFDTF Meeting this monday 2008-06-02 (off-week) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• UFDTF Meeting this monday 2008-06-02 (off-week) Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Question about the topProperty Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Question about problems with top/bottom property Rinke Hoekstra
• ISSUE-129 (rdf:list vocabulary): Desirable to have rdf:list vocabulary available for use in modeling in OWL 2 OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: regrets and a few comments on versioning/imports Bijan Parsia
• Re: rdf:list vocabulary Bijan Parsia

Thursday, 29 May 2008

• [UFDTF] update of UFDTF wiki space and creation of Reqs doc work area Evan Wallace
• RE: Question about problems with top/bottom property Michael Schneider
• Re: "Should" sanity check Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: "Should" sanity check Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger Boris Motik
• Re: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: rif-rdf-owl: OWL WG review Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Question about problems with top/bottom property Boris Motik
• RE: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger Michael Schneider
• RE: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger Boris Motik
• RE: DL-Syntax document: editorial bug Boris Motik
• RE: "Should" sanity check Boris Motik
• DL-Syntax document: editorial bug Michael Schneider
• Question about problems with top/bottom property Michael Schneider
• Re: "Should" sanity check Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: F2F3 survey -- per person or per organization? Alan Ruttenberg

Wednesday, 28 May 2008

• "Should" sanity check Boris Motik
• RE: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger Boris Motik
• Re: F2F3 survey -- per person or per organization? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: regrets and a few comments on versioning/imports Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: regrets and a few comments on versioning/imports Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• regrets and a few comments on versioning/imports Sandro Hawke
• bye for now Jeremy Carroll
• functional style syntax Alan Ruttenberg
• RDF Reification for annotations and negative property assertions Michael Schneider
• Re: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: rdf:list vocabulary Michael Schneider
• RE: rdf:list vocabulary Michael Schneider
• Re: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: reification/annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: rdf:list vocabulary Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: reification/annotations Michael Schneider
• RE: reification/annotations Boris Motik
• RE: reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger Boris Motik
• Issue-111 another angle and questions Alan Ruttenberg
• ISSUE-128 (MAY/SHOULD/MUST): Normative documents should pass a MAY/SHOULD/MUST sanity check OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Requirement for ontology header Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: issue-21 / importing multiple versions of the same ontology Alan Ruttenberg
• issue-21 / importing multiple versions of the same ontology Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Requirement for ontology header Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Requirement for ontology header Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: rdf:list vocabulary Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: rdf:list vocabulary Ivan Herman
• Re: reification/annotations Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: rdf:list vocabulary Alan Ruttenberg
• Requirement for ontology header Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: rdf:list vocabulary Ivan Herman
• Re: reification/annotations Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger Alan Ruttenberg
• reification/annotations Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 27 May 2008

• rdf:list vocabulary Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: Minutes 21/05/2008 Jeff Z. Pan
• Agenda for teleconference 2008-05-28 Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ACTION-150 Alan Ruttenberg
• ACTION-150 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes 21/05/2008 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: Action-131: Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest Boris Motik
• Action-131: Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: [meta] Why not discuss raised-but-non-open issues? Jeremy Carroll
• Minutes 21/05/2008 Jeff Z. Pan

Sunday, 25 May 2008

• No UFDTF Meeting monday due to holidays in US and UK Alan Ruttenberg

Saturday, 24 May 2008

• Re: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] Bijan Parsia
• Re: [meta] Why not discuss raised-but-non-open issues? Bijan Parsia
• Re: [meta] Why not discuss raised-but-non-open issues? Alan Ruttenberg
• [meta] Why not discuss raised-but-non-open issues? Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] Boris Motik
• ISSUE-127 (narynotyet): documents contain bits of nary datatype but these are not yet in OWL 2 [editorial] OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 23 May 2008

• Re: Easy Keys text Bijan Parsia
• Re: Easy Keys text Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Jos de Bruijn

Thursday, 22 May 2008

• Re: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? Alan Wu

Wednesday, 21 May 2008

• Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Evan Wallace
• Re: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) Bijan Parsia
• RE: intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Evan Wallace
• Re: Table/spec accessibility Bijan Parsia
• Re: Table/spec accessibility Sandro Hawke
• Re: Easy Keys text Bijan Parsia
• Table/spec accessibility Bijan Parsia
• Re: Easy Keys text Alan Ruttenberg
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Boris Motik
• Easy Keys text Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Evan Wallace
• Re: GRDDL was Re: Agenda for teleconf 21st May 2008 Ian Horrocks
• ISSUE-126 (Revisit Datatypes): The list of normative datatypes should be revisited OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Ontology locations: OntologyURI vs. xml:base and namespaces (ISSUE-21) Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: Ontology locations: OntologyURI vs. xml:base and namespaces (ISSUE-21) Boris Motik
• Re: Ontology locations: OntologyURI vs. xml:base and namespaces (ISSUE-21) Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: test cases on wiki Bijan Parsia
• Re: test cases on wiki Ian Horrocks
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: GRDDL was Re: Agenda for teleconf 21st May 2008 Sandro Hawke
• I18N issues an OWL2 Jeremy Carroll
• GRDDL was Re: Agenda for teleconf 21st May 2008 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: owl:intendedProfile (proposal for ISSUE-111) Bijan Parsia
• Re: [FULL] ISSUE-119: the other approach Jeremy Carroll
• RE: Ontology locations: OntologyURI vs. xml:base and namespaces (ISSUE-21) Boris Motik
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Boris Motik
• Re: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr
• Re: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Alan Ruttenberg

Tuesday, 20 May 2008

• Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Evan Wallace
• RE: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? Michael Schneider
• [ACTION-147] Delay in review of RDF mapping document Michael Schneider
• RE: [FULL] ISSUE-119: the other approach Michael Schneider
• Agenda for teleconf 21st May 2008 Ian Horrocks
• CfP OWLED 2008 Uli Sattler

Monday, 19 May 2008

• Re: ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? Bijan Parsia
• Re: [FULL] ISSUE-119: the other approach Ian Horrocks
• Re: test cases on wiki Bijan Parsia
• Ontology locations: OntologyURI vs. xml:base and namespaces (ISSUE-21) Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest Rinke Hoekstra

Sunday, 18 May 2008

• ISSUE-125 (min1some): Min 1 QCR = someValuesFrom - Serialize as someValuesFrom? OWL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest Alan Ruttenberg

Friday, 16 May 2008

• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Jeremy Carroll
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Sandro Hawke
• Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Jeremy Carroll
• rif:text / owl:internationalizedString Sandro Hawke
• Re: [p4-feedback] [Pellet-users] Protege4 & Pellet compatibility Rinke Hoekstra

Thursday, 15 May 2008

• ACTION-146: HP and n-ary datatypes Jeremy Carroll
• I have just implemented the proposed resolution of the imports (related to ISSUE-21) Boris Motik
• rif-rdf-owl: OWL WG review Jeremy Carroll

Wednesday, 14 May 2008

• Re: [Full] another minor issue with OWL Full/ rdfs:Datatype vs owl:DataRange Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [Full] another minor issue with OWL Full/ rdfs:Datatype vs owl:DataRange Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RIF comments Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Tuesday, 13 May 2008

• Re: RIF comments Bijan Parsia
• Re: RIF comments Jeremy Carroll
• RIF comments Jeremy Carroll

Monday, 12 May 2008

• Re: UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST Elisa F. Kendall
• [Full] another minor issue with OWL Full/ rdfs:Datatype vs owl:DataRange Jeremy Carroll

Saturday, 10 May 2008

• RE: UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST Boris Motik

Friday, 9 May 2008

• Re: UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST Bijan Parsia
• UFDTF TC Monday 2008-05-12 10AM EST Alan Ruttenberg
• OWL/XML and GRDDL Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Bijan Parsia
• Re: why we need GRDDL (Re: Grddl et al) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Ivan Herman
• Re: why we need GRDDL (Re: Grddl et al) Uli Sattler
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Bijan Parsia
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Rinke Hoekstra
• RE: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Michael Schneider

Thursday, 8 May 2008

• Fwd: Last call announcement: CURIEs Alan Ruttenberg
• why we need GRDDL (Re: Grddl et al) Sandro Hawke
• Grddl et al Uli Sattler
• Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Minutes of yesterday's TC Ivan Herman
• Minutes of yesterday's TC Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Ivan Herman
• RE: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Michael Schneider
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Ivan Herman
• RE: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest Michael Schneider
• RE: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Michael Schneider
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 7 May 2008

• DL-Lite Profile - new tracking implementation Michael Smith
• Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Bijan Parsia
• Want GRDDL intro for WG-dummies :) Michael Schneider
• test cases on wiki Sandro Hawke
• Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: IRC log from 2008-04-30 telecon inaccessible Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: IRC log from 2008-04-30 telecon inaccessible Sandro Hawke
• IRC log from 2008-04-30 telecon inaccessible Michael Smith
• Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 Michael Schneider
• Re: Wiki gone haywire? Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: Wiki gone haywire? Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 Bijan Parsia
• RE: ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 Michael Schneider
• Wiki gone haywire? Rinke Hoekstra
• ACTION-129 and ACTION-132 Bijan Parsia
• RE: Understanding n-ary data predicates Michael Schneider
• RE: Minor bug in http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/rdfs.html#5.2 Michael Schneider
• Re: Understanding n-ary data predicates Bijan Parsia

Tuesday, 6 May 2008

• Re: review of RIF-RDF-OWL (expert level) Jeremy Carroll
• Re: review of RIF-RDF-OWL Jeremy Carroll
• review of RIF-RDF-OWL Jeremy Carroll
• Re: Understanding n-ary data predicates Bijan Parsia
• Re: Agenda for TC 2008-05-07 Jeremy Carroll
• RE: [Imports Task Force] revised imports spec Boris Motik
• Agenda for TC 2008-05-07 Alan Ruttenberg
• Understanding n-ary data predicates Michael Schneider
• Re: syntax for "langed" literals Ivan Herman
• Re: syntax for "langed" literals Sandro Hawke
• Re: proposal to close issue-4 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• syntax for "langed" literals Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Michael Schneider
• [Full] another minor bug in OWL1 Full Jeremy Carroll
• RE: proposal to close issue-4 Michael Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Jeremy Carroll
• proposal to close issue-4 Alan Ruttenberg

Sunday, 4 May 2008

• RE: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain Boris Motik
• ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

Saturday, 3 May 2008

• ISSUE-123 (QCR in OWL-R-Full): Should we add QCR-s into the rule set of OWL-R-Full OWL Working Group Issue Tracker

Friday, 2 May 2008

• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Ivan Herman

Thursday, 1 May 2008

• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Alan Ruttenberg
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Carsten Lutz
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Rinke Hoekstra
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Bijan Parsia
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-108: Names for Profiles Ivan Herman

Last message date: Friday, 30 May 2008 19:49:58 UTC