Re: Multiple ontologies in a single file: RDF vs. the rest from Alan Ruttenberg on 2008-05-07 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from May 2008)

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 12:49:59 -0400
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: hoekstra@uva.nl, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <5C2DD1E3-2B07-48B0-A3D3-70B3B776274E@gmail.com>

On May 7, 2008, at 7:32 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> It turns out that in OWL 1 the validity of RDF graphs as OWL DL
> ontologies in RDF graph form was only determined for imports closures.
> *This is a bad thing.* The agreed-on situation in OWL 2 is much  
> better.


Which agreed-up situation are you referring to? I was unaware that  
this was a resolved issue.

-Alan

Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 16:50:35 UTC