- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 01:33:27 -0400
- To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
I don't think this one is worth taking action on. There is little to win. So I propose we close it as resolved without action. -Alan Issue: Some constructs in the functional syntax accept multiple different kinds of sub-constructs have a fixed order. For example, in an ontology the annotations must preceed the axioms. It would be better to allow the sub-constructs to be mixed together, e.g., to allow interspersing of annotations and axioms in an ontology. Later comment by Peter: 2007-10-29 08:39:19: On further examination, the main construct is Ontology. The other place that order could be relaxed is annotations in axioms, but this causes problems with EntityAnnotation, as that has two kinds of annotations. Perhaps letting annotations have annotations would fix this, but it would introduce an asymmetry between this construct and the "other" axioms.
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 05:35:57 UTC