- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 13:46:10 -0400
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
This was as far as I got (which happened to be on the RIF wiki):
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Test_Case_Format
The big challenges, partially unsolves, as far as I can remember were:
- trying to line up the ontology with what other folks are using so
there is some hope of tool-reuse,
- managing OWL's many serializations
- managing multiple profiles (eg some entailment holds in these three
profiles but not there other three profiles)
- handling multi-part inputs (ie premise+conclusion), which no other WG
seems to need.
My style for putting RDF in HTML is as seen in
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Test_Case_Example
which I have experimental python code for parsing-to-RDF.
(that particular example uses nested tables in a way I no longer want to
use.)
-- Sandro
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 17:48:15 UTC