reverse mapping for xsd:integer vs xsd:nonNegativeInteger from Alan Ruttenberg on 2008-05-28 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from May 2008)

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 23:32:18 -0400
To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <46C0B7D4-7385-492F-9105-04991295D924@gmail.com>

In http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/mapping.html, it says:

For the purposes of determining whether an RDF graph is an OWL DL  
ontology in RDF graph form, cardinality restrictions are explicitly  
allowed to use constructions like "1"^^xsd:integer so long as the  
data value so encoded is a non-negative integer.

Therefore, for backwards compatibility, should the reverse mapping  
explicitly have a mapping for the (non qualified) cardinality cases  
where it currently only says xsd:nonNegativeInteger?

-Alan

Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 03:33:07 UTC