- From: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 09:35:38 +0100
- To: "'Alan Ruttenberg'" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, "'OWL Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
No, we have not yet made this decision. Boris > -----Original Message----- > From: Alan Ruttenberg [mailto:alanruttenberg@gmail.com] > Sent: 28 May 2008 04:19 > To: Boris Motik; OWL Working Group WG > Subject: reification/annotations > > In the RDF mapping document, we have: > > > Consider the following subclass axiom: > > > > SubClassOf( Comment( "Children are people." ) a:Child a:Person ) > > > > Without the annotation, the axiom would be translated into the > > following triple: > > > > a:Child rdfs:subClassOf a:Person > > > > Thus, the annotated axiom is transformed into the following triples: > > > > _:x rdf:type owl:Axiom > > _:x rdf:subject a:Child > > _:x rdf:predicate rdfs:subClassOf > > _:x rdf:object a:Person > > _:x rdfs:comment "Children are people." > > > > > > Had we not decided to include the triple being reified in the > serialization when using reification? So would the serialization be: > > a:Child rdfs:subClassOf a:Person > _:x rdf:type owl:Axiom > _:x rdf:subject a:Child > _:x rdf:predicate rdfs:subClassOf > _:x rdf:object a:Person > _:x rdfs:comment "Children are people." > ? > > > > -Alan > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 May 2008 08:37:09 UTC