Re: ISSUE-124 (datarange complement): The complement of a datarange is defined relative to the whole data domain

Boris Motik wrote:
> Now here is what I believe this is not an issue in practice. A typical ontology would contain an explicit specification of the range
> of R:
> (9) PropertyRange( R xsd:integer )
Yes. This is the bit that I had missed earlier but had just discovered 
in the owl1.1 example (in the family.owl file from  Now I understand where the added scoping of the range 
for the restricted DatatypeProperty
was coming from.  I agree that this addresses the same need that my 
suggested DataIntersectionOf constructor was
intended to fulfill, and thus there is no need for the new constructor.


Received on Wednesday, 21 May 2008 20:10:18 UTC