- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 06:41:48 -0400 (EDT)
- To: hoekstra@uva.nl
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Is this not handled by Table 3 at the very beginning of 3.1 http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs#Parsing_Ontology_Header_and_Declarations and then Table 9 near the beginning of 3.4 http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs#Parsing_of_Axioms peter From: Rinke Hoekstra <hoekstra@uva.nl> Subject: Wiki gone haywire? Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 11:25:47 +0200 > > Hi, > > While composing an email on imports, I was having a look at the FS to > RDF mapping. It turns out that there still is an omission in the RDF to > FS mapping: owl:Ontology descriptions (including imports and > annotations) are not mapped back to the FS (this was my ISSUE-92). > > This is really weird, as Boris has already fixed this and the issue was > closed (cf. [1,2]). > > What's going on here? > > -Rinke > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/0289.html > [2] > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs&diff=3135&oldid=3128
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 10:46:24 UTC