Re: Easy Keys text

Peter has pointed out that the minutes should have been edited to  
reflect the correct poll subject but that as they stand they do not  
support the interpretation I make. Therefore, to dot all the i's I'll  
put this on the Agenda  for the upcoming teleconference so that we can  
get it on record. Specifically I will proposed that Easy Keys is added  
to the specification, with formal acceptance of adding it to OWL 2  
language being part of our next vote to publish, and based on the  
usual review we do before publication.

Bijan, if you would, please hold off on editing the spec until that  
happens. If you have already edited, please revert to the unedited  
version, and accept my apologies extra work my lapse in process rigor  
has caused.

We have been a bit lax on this sort of thing in general recently, for  
example with Boris (routinely for the better) making anticipatory  
edits in order to expedite the process. In the light of Peter's  
concerns, let's please be scrupulous to process and only edit our  
documents to address formally resolved issues, recording diffs and  
their associations to the issues that they address via email or by  
adding notes to the tracker issue pages.


On May 21, 2008, at 1:03 PM, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> On 21 May 2008, at 17:46, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>> My understanding was that we were ready to add to the spec.
>> See 
>>  and my note in the middle of the straw poll clarifying to the  
>> scribe that the poll concerned both top/bottom and easy keys.
> Ok, thanks. I'll do that then.
> Cheers,
> Bijan.

Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 15:36:50 UTC