ISSUE-3 and SPARQL
ISSUE-3 and RDF simple entailment
timed IRC log
FYI: SWCLOS
Call for Comments: SKOS Primer: W3C Working Draft 21 February 2008
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 27th, 2008
Minutes of the Feb 20 meeting are ready for review
Possible new public working draft?
- Re: Possible new public working draft?
- more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?)
Next week's agenda
Fragments
No TF meeting this coming monday
ISSUE-68 (was Re: nonmon mapping and punning)
completeness
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 20th, 2008
Fragments discussion, continued
- RE: Fragments discussion, continued
- Re: Fragments discussion, continued
- Re: Fragments discussion, continued
Draft OWL Lite resolution path ACTION-87
OWLED 2008 DC Registration Open
QA guidance on fragments
owl lite and punning
A thought on fragments and rec-track
A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax
- Re: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax
- Re: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax
No imports task force meeting this coming monday
wiki permissions
Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 13th, 2008
- issue 68 - nonmonotonicity in mapping
- Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 13th, 2008
- Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 13th, 2008
[ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full
- Re: [ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full
- Re: [ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full
- OWL teleconference heads up
[UFDTF] new version of OWL Primer available
correction to minutes 6th Feb
RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
- RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
- RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
- RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
- Re: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
- RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
- RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct
RE: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0)
Re: [Reminder] UFDTF TC @ Mon Feb 11 10am - 11am ()
different kinds of semantics
Reminder: UFDTF Teleconference, Monday February 11 2008, 10AM EST
Observers at Washington F2F
RE: the other DAML+OIL semantics
OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action
- Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action
- Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action
- Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action
- Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action
- Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action
- RE: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action
- Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action
- Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action