public-owl-wg@w3.org from February 2008 by author

Achille Fokoue

• Re: Fragments discussion, continued (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: Fragments discussion, continued (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Fragments discussion, continued (Wednesday, 20 February)

Alan Ruttenberg

• Re: completeness (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• FYI: SWCLOS (Wednesday, 27 February)
• No TF meeting this coming monday (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: completeness (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Fragments discussion, continued (Thursday, 21 February)
• Fragments discussion, continued (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: [ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Monday, 18 February)
• Draft OWL Lite resolution path ACTION-87 (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: different kinds of semantics (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 13th, 2008 (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: issue 68 - nonmonotonicity in mapping (Wednesday, 13 February)
• No imports task force meeting this coming monday (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Reminder: UFDTF Teleconference, Monday February 11 2008, 10AM EST (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: Agenda for 2008.02.06 (and minutes for 30 January 2008) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: Agenda for 2008.02.06 (and minutes for 30 January 2008) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Agenda for 2008.02.06 (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Discussion topics for OWL Full discussion (Monday, 4 February)
• Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday (Friday, 1 February)

Alan Wu

• Re: Fragments (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Minutes of the Feb 20 meeting are ready for review (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Minutes of the Feb 20 meeting are ready for review (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: completeness (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: completeness (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: completeness (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Wednesday, 13 February)

Antoine Isaac

• Call for Comments: SKOS Primer: W3C Working Draft 21 February 2008 (Tuesday, 26 February)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: Action 91 and issue 95 (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: more FPWDs? (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: more FPWDs? (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: Fragments discussion, continued (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: completeness (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: completeness (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: completeness (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: completeness (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: completeness (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: Why has the RDF mapping conditional mapping rules? (ISSUE-68) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: Why has the RDF mapping conditional mapping rules? (ISSUE-68) (Tuesday, 5 February)

Boris Motik

• RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Possible new public working draft? (Tuesday, 26 February)
• RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct (Wednesday, 20 February)
• RE: Fragments discussion, continued (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax (Tuesday, 19 February)
• RE: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax (Thursday, 14 February)
• A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct (Wednesday, 13 February)
• RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct (Sunday, 10 February)
• RE: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) (Sunday, 10 February)
• RE: imports (Wednesday, 6 February)
• A description of a relationship between pD*-lie fragments of OWL and DLP (Tuesday, 5 February)

Carsten Lutz

• Re: Fragments (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: Fragments discussion, continued (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track (Friday, 15 February)
• A thought on fragments and rec-track (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: A description of a relationship between pD*-lie fragments of OWL and DLP (Thursday, 7 February)

Deborah L. McGuinness

• Re: Action 91 and issue 95 (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Wednesday, 13 February)

dlmcg1@aol.com

• Re: Fragments discussion, continued (Wednesday, 20 February)
• Re: Agenda for 2008.02.06 (Wednesday, 6 February)

Elisa F. Kendall

• Re: timed IRC log (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 13th, 2008 (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Reminder] UFDTF TC @ Mon Feb 11 10am - 11am () (Sunday, 10 February)

Evan Wallace

• Action 91 and issue 95 (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 27th, 2008 (Tuesday, 26 February)

Giorgos Stoilos

• RE: completeness (Friday, 29 February)
• RE: completeness (Thursday, 28 February)

Ian Horrocks

• Re: Fragments (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: UFDTF: Primer. Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) (Thursday, 28 February)
• Fwd: Fragments (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 27th, 2008 (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Next week's agenda (Friday, 22 February)
• Fragments (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: completeness (Thursday, 21 February)
• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 20th, 2008 (Tuesday, 19 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 13th, 2008 (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Observers at Washington F2F (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: the other DAML+OIL semantics (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Thursday, 7 February)

Ivan Herman

• Re: more FPWDs? (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: Minutes of the Feb 20 meeting are ready for review (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Monday, 18 February)
• Re: pD* [WAS: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action] (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Friday, 8 February)

Jeff Z. Pan

• Re: ISSUE-3 and SPARQL (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: Fwd: Fragments (Thursday, 28 February)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: ISSUE-3 and SPARQL (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: ISSUE-3 and SPARQL (Friday, 29 February)
• ISSUE-3 and SPARQL (Friday, 29 February)
• ISSUE-3 and RDF simple entailment (Friday, 29 February)
• UFDTF: Primer. Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) (Thursday, 28 February)
• timed IRC log (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: more FPWDs? (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: more FPWDs? (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Possible new public working draft? (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: Fragments discussion, continued (Monday, 25 February)
• Re: Fragments discussion, continued (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: completeness (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track (Friday, 15 February)
• Re: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Thursday, 14 February)
• QA guidance on fragments (Thursday, 14 February)
• owl lite and punning (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Wednesday, 13 February)
• issue 68 - nonmonotonicity in mapping (Tuesday, 12 February)
• correction to minutes 6th Feb (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: different kinds of semantics (Monday, 11 February)
• Re: the other DAML+OIL semantics (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: proposal for ISSUE-3 (ACTION-81) (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Thursday, 7 February)
• imports (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: (URGENT) Re: Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday (Monday, 4 February)
• (URGENT) Re: Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday (Monday, 4 February)

Jim Hendler

• Re: ISSUE-3 and RDF simple entailment (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: completeness (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Fragments (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: Fragments (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: Fragments discussion, continued (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: completeness (Friday, 22 February)
• Re: completeness (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: completeness (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Fragments discussion, continued (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: completeness (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: Fragments discussion, continued (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track (Thursday, 14 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: [ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: [ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Sunday, 10 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Thursday, 7 February)
• OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: Discussion topics for OWL Full discussion (Tuesday, 5 February)
• Re: Discussion topics for OWL Full discussion (Monday, 4 February)

Kashyap, Vipul

• RE: different kinds of semantics (Saturday, 9 February)
• RE: different kinds of semantics (Saturday, 9 February)
• RE: [UFDTF] My action to compare documents - a starting point for discussion tomorrow (Monday, 4 February)

Michael Schneider

• RE: ISSUE-3 and RDF simple entailment (Friday, 29 February)
• RE: completeness (Friday, 29 February)
• RE: completeness (Friday, 29 February)
• RE: timed IRC log (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: timed IRC log (Thursday, 28 February)
• RE: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct (Wednesday, 27 February)
• RE: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• RE: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) (Tuesday, 26 February)
• ISSUE-95: Proposal for recursive DatatypeRestrictionS [WAS: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 27th, 2008] (Tuesday, 26 February)
• RE: ISSUE-68 (was Re: nonmon mapping and punning) (Tuesday, 26 February)
• RE: ISSUE-68 (was Re: nonmon mapping and punning) (Monday, 25 February)
• RE: completeness (Monday, 25 February)
• RE: completeness (Monday, 25 February)
• RE: completeness (Friday, 22 February)
• RE: completeness (Friday, 22 February)
• RE: completeness (Friday, 22 February)
• RE: completeness (Friday, 22 February)
• RE: completeness (Thursday, 21 February)
• RE: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax (Wednesday, 20 February)
• RE: [ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full (Monday, 18 February)
• RE: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Monday, 18 February)
• RE: pD* [WAS: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action] (Friday, 15 February)
• pD* [WAS: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action] (Thursday, 14 February)
• RE: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Wednesday, 13 February)
• [ACTION-78] What it means to define OWL-1.1-Full as a "delta" to OWL-1.0-Full (Tuesday, 12 February)
• RE: the other DAML+OIL semantics (Friday, 8 February)
• RE: the other DAML+OIL semantics (Thursday, 7 February)
• RE: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Thursday, 7 February)
• RE: Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• RE: Why has the RDF mapping conditional mapping rules? (ISSUE-68) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Possible backwards compatibility issue with the RDF-to-FS mapping (Wednesday, 6 February)
• RE: Why has the RDF mapping conditional mapping rules? (ISSUE-68) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Why has the RDF mapping conditional mapping rules? (ISSUE-68) (Tuesday, 5 February)
• RE: (URGENT) Re: Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday (Monday, 4 February)
• RE: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) (Friday, 1 February)

Michael Smith

• Re: Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) (Wednesday, 6 February)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: completeness (Thursday, 28 February)
• Re: ISSUE-95 (Datatype-facet compatibility in DatatypeRestriction): No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: Action 91 and issue 95 (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: more FPWDs? (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 27th, 2008 (Tuesday, 26 February)
• more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: completeness (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: completeness (Tuesday, 26 February)
• Re: completeness (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: ISSUE-68 (Thursday, 21 February)
• ISSUE-68 (was Re: nonmon mapping and punning) (Thursday, 21 February)
• Re: OWL teleconference heads up (Wednesday, 20 February)
• OWL teleconference heads up (Wednesday, 20 February)
• OWLED 2008 DC Registration Open (Friday, 15 February)
• [UFDTF] new version of OWL Primer available (Tuesday, 12 February)
• Re: different kinds of semantics (Saturday, 9 February)
• different kinds of semantics (Saturday, 9 February)
• Re: the other DAML+OIL semantics (Friday, 8 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Thursday, 7 February)
• Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• proposal for ISSUE-3 (ACTION-81) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• minutes for 30 January 2008) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: Agenda for 2008.02.06 (and minutes for 30 January 2008) (Wednesday, 6 February)
• Re: (URGENT) Re: Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday (Monday, 4 February)
• Re: possible way forward on ISSUE-69 (1.1/Full punning) and ISSUE-72 (backwards comptability) (Friday, 1 February)
• Re: Fragments discussion (Friday, 1 February)

Rinke Hoekstra

• Re: Agenda for teleconference Wednesday February 13th, 2008 (Wednesday, 13 February)
• Re: (URGENT) Re: Reminder: Imports task force meeting monday (Monday, 4 February)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: timed IRC log (Thursday, 28 February)
• wiki permissions (Tuesday, 12 February)

Uli Sattler

• Re: ISSUE-3 and RDF simple entailment (Friday, 29 February)
• Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) (Wednesday, 27 February)
• Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track (Friday, 15 February)

Ulrike Sattler

• completeness (Wednesday, 20 February)

Vojtech Svatek

• Re: A thought on fragments and rec-track (Friday, 15 February)

Last message date: Friday, 29 February 2008 21:21:33 UTC