Re: ISSUE-3 and SPARQL

Jeff Z. Pan wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>> [...]
>> Since DL-Lite is defined from OWL 1.1 DL, then we run the risk that 
>> answers from
>>
>> SPARQL over triple-store over database.
>>
>> become false over
>>
>> SPARQL over DL-Lite over triple-store over database.
>>
>> (I am happy to be corrected if this is not the case; I am not expert 
>> in any of the technologies mentioned in this message!)
> 
> Could you clarify what do we mean by "over" here?

Probably not :(

Definitely not today - I'll try on Monday.

Jeremy

Received on Friday, 29 February 2008 21:21:33 UTC