Re: OWL Full proposal (sort of) - addressing my Action

ohh, you're no fun!

but seriously, I apologize, this was not meant to be perjorative (I  
thought it made equal fun of both sides) - but if anyone took offense  
I apologize, and I will try to stick to business and avoid frivolity  
in the future
  -JH


On Feb 7, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Ian Horrocks wrote:

>
> Thanks Jeremy for catching this.
>
> Jim, can I please draw your attention to [1] and ask you to exercise  
> a little more restraint.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Jan/ 
> 0395.html
>
> On 7 Feb 2008, at 17:23, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
>>
>> Jim Hendler wrote:
>>> Mike - that's easy - there's the semantics document the Webbies  
>>> preferred and the one the formal KR folks preferred - can you  
>>> guess which is which?
>>
>>
>> please - we have enough conflict with today's battles, without  
>> digging up the graves from battles that were won or lost long ago.
>>
>> Jeremy
>>
>
>

"If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would  
it?." - Albert Einstein

Prof James Hendler				http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~hendler
Tetherless World Constellation Chair
Computer Science Dept
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy NY 12180

Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 00:55:05 UTC