- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:00:44 +0900
- To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: "Michael Schneider" <schneid@fzi.de>, "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, public-owl-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <29af5e2d0802270600r22c722daj46ea376fff3098de@mail.gmail.com>
I concur with Ivan's assessment.-Alan On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > Michael, > > I believe this would be more than just 'illustration'. If such an XSLT > transform was done and its references properly added to the namespace > document of OWL/XML, that would mean that every OWL/XML document could > be automatically transformed into RDF/XML via a GRDDL aware processor > (and they already exist!), which would have all kinds of practical > advantages. And, of course, an implementation may reveal possible > inconsistencies that could improve the quality of all specifications > involved... > > Ivan > > Michael Schneider wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hpl.hp.com] > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:12 AM > >> To: Michael Schneider > >> Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org > >> Subject: Re: more FPWDs? (was Re: Possible new public working draft?) > >> > >> Michael Schneider wrote: > >> > >>> Can you please elaborate on this point? Personally, I do not > >> know much about > >>> GRDDL, and in particular I do not understand how GRDDL relates to the > >>> OWL/XML serialization. > >>> > >> > >> GRDDL allows a transform (usually written in XSLT) to be > >> associated with > >> either a specific XML document, or via a namespace document, > >> with an XML > >> namespace. > >> > >> This transform takes XML documents with root elements in that > >> namespace > >> as input, and as output gives an RDF/XML document. > >> > >> Hence, implementing the mapping rules as XSLT, and using GRDDL would > >> illustrate the relationship between the OWL/XML syntax, the functional > >> syntax, the graph syntax and RDF/XML. > >> > >> Jeremy > > > > Thanks, Jeremy, for the explanation! > > > > I do not understand why we need to explictly show a relationship between > OWL/XML and RDF/XML. There's a mapping between Functional Syntax and OWL/XML > on the one hand, and between Functional Syntax and RDF on the other hand, > together with a serialization mapping between RDF and RDF/XML. > > > > Cheers, > > Michael > > > > -- > > Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider > > FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik Karlsruhe > > Abtl. Information Process Engineering (IPE) > > Tel : +49-721-9654-726 > > Fax : +49-721-9654-727 > > Email: Michael.Schneider@fzi.de > > Web : http://www.fzi.de/ipe/eng/mitarbeiter.php?id=555 > > > > FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe > > Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe > > Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 > > Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts > > Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe > > Vorstand: Rüdiger Dillmann, Michael Flor, Jivka Ovtcharova, Rudi Studer > > Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus > > -- > > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 14:00:57 UTC