- From: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:05:10 +0000
- To: Uli Sattler <sattler@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, jjc@hpl.hp.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org
On 27 Feb 2008, at 18:41, Uli Sattler wrote: > > I am definitely in favour for getting the Primer out as soon as > possible: it's a lovely piece of work, and filling in a whole ...a hole, of course, a hole: such a thing was missing before! > as a "first read" for people new to OWL. > > Also the XML serialization should go out as well so that people > could use it to build their tools. > > Cheers, Uli > > On 26 Feb 2008, at 17:46, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > >> >> From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com> >> Subject: Re: Possible new public working draft? >> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:28:44 +0000 >> >>> Boris Motik wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> The first working drafts have been "out" for a while. We think >>>> that it >>>> would be useful to have second versions of these documents >>>> published before the next F2F so that that F2F can be concerned >>>> with >>>> work going forward instead of looking at documents that reflect >>>> the past. So, could there be an agenda item this week to start the >>>> process of approving a second version of these three documents >>>> with a target publication date a bit before the second >>>> teleconference? >>>> Bernardo, Bijan, Boris, Peter >>> >>> Hmmm, while this is a good idea (publish early, publish often); >>> I fear that it would have been better if we were in a position to >>> have >>> more FPWDs of other documents. >>> >>> Jeremy >> >> There are two other documents that could be published. >> >> 1/ XML Serialization http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/ >> XML_Serialization >> >> This document comes from the initial OWL 1.1 submission. I >> modified >> it recently, mostly to make it more self-contained by >> incorporating >> the XML Schema itself into the document (instead of just >> pointing to >> the schema from the document). The document probably needs a >> sanity >> check to make sure that it corresponds to the current OWL 1.1 >> syntax, >> as it may not have been completely updated. I think that this >> check >> and any needed changes could be done quite quickly (i.e., >> before next >> week's teleconference) and a publication review could be initiated >> then. >> >> 2/ OWL Primer http://www.webont.org/owl/documents/primer.html >> >> The UFDTF has been talking about this document and may discuss it >> further on Monday. Bijan and I have been updating and >> completing the >> document. There is one missing sub-section and some of the >> examples >> don't have RDF/XML syntax, but I feel that the document could >> also be >> quickly made ready for publication review. >> >> peter >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:05:03 UTC