- From: Elisa F. Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:20:54 -0800
- To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Regrets for this afternoon - I'm traveling. Happy Valentine's Day (almost), Elisa Ian Horrocks wrote: > > Teleconference.2008.02.13/Agenda > > Call in details > > If joining late please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, > Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC > > * Date of Call: Wednesday February 13, 2007 > * Time of Call: 1800 UTC, 10:00AM (West US), 1:00PM (East US), > 18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris) > * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA) > * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France) > * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK) > * Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG) > * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl > ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl]) > * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc > (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla) > * Duration: 90 minutes > * Chair: Ian Horrocks > * Scribe: Scribe List > * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference. > 2008.02.13/Agenda > > Agenda > > * ADMIN (15 min) > o Roll call > o Agenda amendments > o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes > o Washington F2F (10 min) > + OWLED > + Observers > + Registration and/or Sponsorship > + Attendees > o Action items status > + Pending Review Actions > # Action 78 Explain what delta to 1.0 semantics > means / Michael Schneider > # Action 80 Will describe an approach to a > "operationall semantics" approach to OWL Full / James Hendler > # Action 81 Send out proposal for minimal > change for issue-3 / Peter Patel-Schneider > # Action 82 Edit the secification to mention > the well-known ontology properties in the spirit of OWL 1.0 and thus > possibly resolve ISSUE-91 / Boris Motik > # Action 84 Change the spec to add a table with > facet-datatype compatibility / Boris Motik > + Due and overdue Actions > # Action 43 Develop scripts to extract test > cases from wiki, coordinating with Bijan, Jeremey, Alan / Sandro Hawke > # Action 62 Add test guidelines to working > group to agenda for next week / Alan Ruttenberg > # Action 72 Put his use case for punning onto a > wiki page (for reasoning associated with punned properties, and the > question about object data property punning vs annotation properties) > / Alan Ruttenberg > > * Proposals to Resolve Issues (15 mins) > o Issue 3 Lack of anonymous individuals (see http:// > lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0029.html) > o Issue 91 Spec lacks ontology properties (see http:// > lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0062.html) > o Issue 95 No compatibility restrictions between the > datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction > construct (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/ > 2008Feb/0063.html) > * General Discussions (30 min) > o Fragments and Conformance (Continued) > * Issues (15 min) > o Raised Issues > o Resolved Editorial Issues > o Issue Discussions > + Issue 68 mapping rules are non-monotonic (more > precisely, this relates to the mapping of the qualified cardinality > constructors) > + Issue 16 Entity annotations status > + Issue 69 punning is incompatible with OWL Full > + Issue 90 Spec lacks 'Deprecated' marker for > classes, properties and datatypes (OWL 1.0 compatibility) > + Issue 94 Issues surrounding roundtripping > * Additional other business (5 min) > > Next Week(s) > > * General Discussions (not necessarily in this order) > o Fragments and Conformance > o Imports > o OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full compatibility) > o Versioning > o Easy Keys > o Rich Annotations > o Test Cases > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2008 14:21:12 UTC