Re: Concern about limiting allowed dataranges in DatatypeRestriction (for ACTION-83) from Michael Smith on 2008-02-06 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from February 2008)

From: Michael Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:48:48 -0500
To: public-owl-wg <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1202338128.11452.38.camel@msmith-laptop>

On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 16:19 -0500, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Although the nesting does not add expressive power, I would prefer that
> the nested syntax also be allowed, in part because this would mirror XML
> Schema datatypes (which has a notion of the underlying datatype) and in
> part because it would pave the way for sharing parts of data range
> constructs.

Can you elaborate on "sharing parts of data range constructs" ?  This
seems to require naming dataranges, which the current syntax doesn't
allow.

Thanks,
-- 
Mike Smith

Clark & Parsia

Received on Wednesday, 6 February 2008 22:49:02 UTC