- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:07:32 +0000
- To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>
- CC: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, "'Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Jim Hendler wrote: > OWL (DL/Full) > EL ++ // (and Owl lite) > OWL For Data (DL/Full) > That would be quite elegant if it worked! I think it is worth bearing this in mind, but I wouldn't want to distort things too much for it. I would agree that, as long as the details work out, this would be in accord with the sort of desires shown in the straw poll. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 25 February 2008 11:08:18 UTC