- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:46:35 +0000
- To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Concerning ACTION-88 Michael wondered about the impact of OWL 1.1 punning on OWL Lite. I think this is a non-issue. For any OWL 1.1 feature (e.g. QCRs) we have to decide whether or not that is included in OWL Lite. Due to the design goals of OWL Lite, we clearly default as 'no - it's not included'. Punning is one of these; and so no OWL Lite does not include punning (although we might get user feedback from actual OWL Lite users suggesting we should include it) While this is a somewhat strange syntactic constraint on OWL Lite vs OWL 1.1 DL, it is not that much stranger than say allowing minCardinality restrictions only with values 0 and 1. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 14 February 2008 13:47:00 UTC