- From: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:14:36 -0000
- To: "'OWL Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hello, As decided at the last telecon and recoded in ACTION-82, I just changed the structural specification and have added the three well-known ontology annotations to OWL 1.1. Here is the URL to the diff: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=Syntax&diff=3310&oldid=3218 Please let me know should you have any comments. I hope that we'll be able to close ISSUE-91 next week. Regards, Boris > -----Original Message----- > From: public-owl-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-owl-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of OWL Working > Group Issue Tracker > Sent: 21 December 2007 11:38 > To: public-owl-wg@w3.org > Subject: ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) > > > > ISSUE-91 (ontology properties): Spec lacks ontology properties (compatibility with OWL 1.0) > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/ > > Raised by: Rinke Hoekstra > On product: > > The OWL 1.0 specification distinguishes 5 kinds of properties: 'rdf', annotation, object, datatype > and ontology properties [1]. > > Both the 1.1 syntax [2] and RDF mapping [4] documents lack a mapping for the ontology properties of > OWL 1.0. > > Ontology properties are: owl:imports, owl:priorVersion, owl:backwardCompatibleWith, and > owl:incompatibleWith. > > The 1.1 syntax and mapping documents do handle owl:imports, but not the other properties. > > Related to ISSUE-90, versioning [4] and imports > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/syntax.html#2.1 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax > [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Mapping_to_RDF_Graphs > [4] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Ontology_Versions > [5] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Imports > >
Received on Sunday, 10 February 2008 19:15:30 UTC