Re: A proposal for introducing anonymous individuals into OWL 1.1 functional-style syntax from Alan Ruttenberg on 2008-02-18 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from February 2008)

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:48:10 -0500
To: Boris Motik <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: "'OWL Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0BF06241-A98C-44B2-AB13-D7450D65A799@gmail.com>

On Feb 13, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Boris Motik wrote:

> Finally, we would extend the semantics document to treat anonymous  
> individuals in exactly the same way as this is done in SPARQL. This  
> would give us a slightly weaker semantics than what is currently  
> available in OWL (1.0) Full.

Hi Boris,

This seems to be the skolem proposal again,  as close as I can tell.  
Do I misunderstand?

-Alan

Received on Monday, 18 February 2008 05:48:23 UTC