Re: completeness from Alan Ruttenberg on 2008-02-28 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from February 2008)

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 14:58:26 -0500
To: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: gstoil@image.ece.ntua.gr, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <816FCA2E-BC65-499D-9FD8-48F6A63F3FFF@gmail.com>

On Feb 28, 2008, at 6:10 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> Note: I have not thought much about the pD* treatment of owl:sameAs as
> it relates to messing with the OWL vocabulary.

We have some choices in defining this fragment. OWLPrime advocates:  
Do you really want to be able to mess with the OWL vocabulary,  
considering that it opens up all sorts of possibilities for trouble?

-Alan

Received on Thursday, 28 February 2008 21:38:55 UTC