- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:34:16 +0000
- To: Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Following on from Alan's message [1] here is the agenda for tomorrow;
note that we will continue with the fragments discussion from last week.
Ian
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0120.html
Teleconference.2008.02.20/Agenda
Call in details
If joining late please don't identify yourself verbally; instead,
Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC
* Date of Call: Wednesday February 20, 2007
* Time of Call: 1800 UTC, 10:00AM (West US), 1:00PM (East US),
18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris)
* Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
* Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
* Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
* Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
* IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl
([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
* Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
* Duration: 90 minutes
* Chair: Alan Ruttenberg
* Scribe: Scribe List
* Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.
2008.02.20/Agenda
Agenda
* ADMIN (15 min)
o Roll call
o Agenda amendments
o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (13 February)
o Action items status
+ Pending Review Actions
# Action 87 Write draft OWL Lite resolution,
checking that it will have same semantics in 1.1 / Alan Ruttenberg
# Action 88 Respond to punning and owl lite
point / Jeremy Carroll
# Action 89 Investigate QA group advised
recently to have "as few parts as possible" / Jeremy Carroll
+ Due and overdue Actions
# Action 43 Develop scripts to extract test
cases from wiki, coordinating with Bijan, Jeremey, Alan / Sandro Hawke
# Action 86 Send proposal for issue-91
ontology property / Jeremy Carroll
* Proposals to Resolve Issues (0 mins)
* General Discussions (30 min)
o Fragments and Conformance (Continued)
* Issues (40 min)
o Raised Issues
o Resolved Editorial Issues
o Issue Discussions
+ Issue 3 Lack of anonymous individuals (see http://
lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0090.html)
+ Issue 91 Spec lacks ontology properties (see
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0062.html)
+ Issue 95 No compatibility restrictions between the
datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction
construct (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/
2008Feb/0089.html)
+ Issue 68 mapping rules are non-monotonic (more
precisely, this relates to the mapping of the qualified cardinality
constructors)
+ Issue 16 Entity annotations status
+ Issue 69 punning is incompatible with OWL Full
+ Issue 90 Spec lacks 'Deprecated' marker for
classes, properties and datatypes (OWL 1.0 compatibility)
+ Issue 94 Issues surrounding roundtripping
* Additional other business (5 min)
Next Week(s)
* General Discussions (not necessarily in this order)
o Fragments and Conformance
o Imports
o OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full
compatibility)
o Versioning
o Easy Keys
o Rich Annotations
o Test Cases
Regrets
* Martin Dzbor ... travelling + project meetings outside UK
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 16:34:25 UTC