- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:56:44 +0000
- To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Teleconference.2008.02.13/Agenda Call in details If joining late please don't identify yourself verbally; instead, Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC * Date of Call: Wednesday February 13, 2007 * Time of Call: 1800 UTC, 10:00AM (West US), 1:00PM (East US), 18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris) * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA) * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France) * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK) * Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG) * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl ([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl]) * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc (Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla) * Duration: 90 minutes * Chair: Ian Horrocks * Scribe: Scribe List * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference. 2008.02.13/Agenda Agenda * ADMIN (15 min) o Roll call o Agenda amendments o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes o Washington F2F (10 min) + OWLED + Observers + Registration and/or Sponsorship + Attendees o Action items status + Pending Review Actions # Action 78 Explain what delta to 1.0 semantics means / Michael Schneider # Action 80 Will describe an approach to a "operationall semantics" approach to OWL Full / James Hendler # Action 81 Send out proposal for minimal change for issue-3 / Peter Patel-Schneider # Action 82 Edit the secification to mention the well-known ontology properties in the spirit of OWL 1.0 and thus possibly resolve ISSUE-91 / Boris Motik # Action 84 Change the spec to add a table with facet-datatype compatibility / Boris Motik + Due and overdue Actions # Action 43 Develop scripts to extract test cases from wiki, coordinating with Bijan, Jeremey, Alan / Sandro Hawke # Action 62 Add test guidelines to working group to agenda for next week / Alan Ruttenberg # Action 72 Put his use case for punning onto a wiki page (for reasoning associated with punned properties, and the question about object data property punning vs annotation properties) / Alan Ruttenberg * Proposals to Resolve Issues (15 mins) o Issue 3 Lack of anonymous individuals (see http:// lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0029.html) o Issue 91 Spec lacks ontology properties (see http:// lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0062.html) o Issue 95 No compatibility restrictions between the datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction construct (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/ 2008Feb/0063.html) * General Discussions (30 min) o Fragments and Conformance (Continued) * Issues (15 min) o Raised Issues o Resolved Editorial Issues o Issue Discussions + Issue 68 mapping rules are non-monotonic (more precisely, this relates to the mapping of the qualified cardinality constructors) + Issue 16 Entity annotations status + Issue 69 punning is incompatible with OWL Full + Issue 90 Spec lacks 'Deprecated' marker for classes, properties and datatypes (OWL 1.0 compatibility) + Issue 94 Issues surrounding roundtripping * Additional other business (5 min) Next Week(s) * General Discussions (not necessarily in this order) o Fragments and Conformance o Imports o OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full compatibility) o Versioning o Easy Keys o Rich Annotations o Test Cases
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:57:09 UTC