- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:56:44 +0000
- To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Teleconference.2008.02.13/Agenda
Call in details
If joining late please don't identify yourself verbally; instead,
Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC
* Date of Call: Wednesday February 13, 2007
* Time of Call: 1800 UTC, 10:00AM (West US), 1:00PM (East US),
18:00 (London), 19:00 (Paris)
* Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
* Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
* Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
* Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
* IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl
([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
* Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
* Duration: 90 minutes
* Chair: Ian Horrocks
* Scribe: Scribe List
* Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.
2008.02.13/Agenda
Agenda
* ADMIN (15 min)
o Roll call
o Agenda amendments
o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes
o Washington F2F (10 min)
+ OWLED
+ Observers
+ Registration and/or Sponsorship
+ Attendees
o Action items status
+ Pending Review Actions
# Action 78 Explain what delta to 1.0
semantics means / Michael Schneider
# Action 80 Will describe an approach to a
"operationall semantics" approach to OWL Full / James Hendler
# Action 81 Send out proposal for minimal
change for issue-3 / Peter Patel-Schneider
# Action 82 Edit the secification to mention
the well-known ontology properties in the spirit of OWL 1.0 and thus
possibly resolve ISSUE-91 / Boris Motik
# Action 84 Change the spec to add a table
with facet-datatype compatibility / Boris Motik
+ Due and overdue Actions
# Action 43 Develop scripts to extract test
cases from wiki, coordinating with Bijan, Jeremey, Alan / Sandro Hawke
# Action 62 Add test guidelines to working
group to agenda for next week / Alan Ruttenberg
# Action 72 Put his use case for punning onto
a wiki page (for reasoning associated with punned properties, and the
question about object data property punning vs annotation
properties) / Alan Ruttenberg
* Proposals to Resolve Issues (15 mins)
o Issue 3 Lack of anonymous individuals (see http://
lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0029.html)
o Issue 91 Spec lacks ontology properties (see http://
lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008Feb/0062.html)
o Issue 95 No compatibility restrictions between the
datatype being restricted and the facets in the DatatypeRestriction
construct (see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/
2008Feb/0063.html)
* General Discussions (30 min)
o Fragments and Conformance (Continued)
* Issues (15 min)
o Raised Issues
o Resolved Editorial Issues
o Issue Discussions
+ Issue 68 mapping rules are non-monotonic (more
precisely, this relates to the mapping of the qualified cardinality
constructors)
+ Issue 16 Entity annotations status
+ Issue 69 punning is incompatible with OWL Full
+ Issue 90 Spec lacks 'Deprecated' marker for
classes, properties and datatypes (OWL 1.0 compatibility)
+ Issue 94 Issues surrounding roundtripping
* Additional other business (5 min)
Next Week(s)
* General Discussions (not necessarily in this order)
o Fragments and Conformance
o Imports
o OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full
compatibility)
o Versioning
o Easy Keys
o Rich Annotations
o Test Cases
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2008 17:57:09 UTC