Adrian Giurca
Alan Ruttenberg
Alessandra Toninelli
Benedicto Rodriguez
Bijan Parsia
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: problems with imports (Sunday, 2 December)
- Re: OWL Custom display (Sunday, 25 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: bags of axioms (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: bags of axioms (Thursday, 1 November)
- Re: CIFP (Tuesday, 30 October)
- Re: Role of 'public-webont-comments'? [WAS: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict?] (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Re: typo in OWL 1.1 syntax (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: Is OWL-1.1 issue 14 still an issue? (Thursday, 11 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are (Wednesday, 3 October)
- [TF:Rules][TF:UnO][TF:RA] Blog posts of interest (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: bnodes (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: bnodes (Tuesday, 2 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are (Monday, 1 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are (Monday, 1 October)
Bill Bug
Boris Motik
Carsten Lutz
Chimezie Ogbuji
Chris Mungall
Christopher Rose
Dan Brickley
Daniel Olmedilla
Danny Ayers
Dmitry Tsarkov
Emanuele D'Arrigo
Enrico Franconi
Evren Sirin
ewallace@cme.nist.gov
Frank Manola
Gerd Wagner
Giorgos Stoilos
Hans Teijgeler
Heiner Stuckenschmidt
Ian Horrocks
Ibach, Brandon L
Ivan Herman
james.lapalme@videotron.ca
Jennifer Vendetti
Jeremy Carroll
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning (Friday, 21 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (Thursday, 20 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (Tuesday, 11 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (Monday, 10 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments (Thursday, 29 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 (Thursday, 22 November)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 (Wednesday, 21 November)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Wednesday, 24 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Wednesday, 24 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: a comment on geography (was Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full) (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: bnodes (Wednesday, 3 October)
Jim Hendler
Jinjun Chen
Joerg Hoffmann
John McClure
Kendall Clark
LangTech2008 secretariat
Luciano, Joanne S.
Matthew Pocock
Michael Gruninger
Michael Schneider
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning (Saturday, 22 December)
- [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning (Friday, 21 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (Thursday, 20 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full (Wednesday, 19 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full (Monday, 17 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full (Monday, 17 December)
- [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] (Sunday, 16 December)
- [OWLWG-COMMENT] QCR problem in OWL 1.1 Full - action ?? from F2F (Thursday, 13 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (Tuesday, 11 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (Tuesday, 11 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (Tuesday, 11 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (Sunday, 9 December)
- [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (Saturday, 8 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments (Saturday, 1 December)
- [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments (Tuesday, 27 November)
- [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): REPORTED: use of reification in mapping rules is unwise (Thursday, 22 November)
- RE: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 (Wednesday, 21 November)
- [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-27 and "antisymmetric" vs. "asymmetric" object properties (Tuesday, 20 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Defining the universal property in OWL-1.1 (Monday, 12 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? (Monday, 12 November)
- [OWLWG-COMMENT] Defining the universal property in OWL-1.1 (Saturday, 10 November)
- [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? (Saturday, 10 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Tuesday, 6 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: What about sub property chains for datatype properties? (ISSUE-8) (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Monday, 5 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Friday, 2 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Friday, 2 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Friday, 2 November)
- [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Thursday, 1 November)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Thursday, 25 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Wednesday, 24 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Tuesday, 23 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Tuesday, 23 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Monday, 22 October)
- Axiom closures, and the best place for the "Non-Structural Restrictions" chapter (Friday, 19 October)
- RE: (Object|Data)Property axioms missing in semantics document (Thursday, 18 October)
- (Object|Data)Property axioms missing in semantics document (Thursday, 18 October)
- RE: Role of 'public-webont-comments'? [WAS: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict?] (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Role of 'public-webont-comments'? [WAS: Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict?] (Wednesday, 17 October)
- Are the acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict? (Tuesday, 16 October)
- RE: A perfect brother [WAS: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1] (Monday, 15 October)
- A perfect brother [WAS: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1] (Monday, 15 October)
- RE: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 (Friday, 12 October)
- Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 (Friday, 12 October)
- RE: Is OWL-1.1 issue 14 still an issue? (Thursday, 11 October)
- Is OWL-1.1 issue 14 still an issue? (Thursday, 11 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types (Tuesday, 9 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types (Tuesday, 9 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types (Sunday, 7 October)
- RE: Unclear about Nonstructural Restriction [WAS: Inferring Properties based on Types] (Friday, 5 October)
- Unclear about Nonstructural Restriction [WAS: Inferring Properties based on Types] (Friday, 5 October)
- Wrong axiom names in "Nonstructural" chapter of OWL-1.1 draft (Thursday, 4 October)
- RE: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are (Wednesday, 3 October)
- What about sub property chains for datatype properties? (Tuesday, 2 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types (Tuesday, 2 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types (Monday, 1 October)
- RE: Inferring Properties based on Types (Monday, 1 October)
Mircea Diaconescu
Obrst, Leo J.
Pat Hayes
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning (Saturday, 22 December)
- [OWLWG-COMMENT] Re: Cardinality Restrictions and Punning (Friday, 21 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (Thursday, 20 December)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full (Wednesday, 19 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] (Monday, 17 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full [Re: PROPOSAL to close ISSUE-68] (Sunday, 16 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments (Friday, 30 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments (Thursday, 29 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments (Wednesday, 28 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-67 (reification): real semantic-free RDF-comments (Tuesday, 27 November)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 (Friday, 23 November)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 (Thursday, 22 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? (Monday, 12 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Higher order quantification in OWL-DL with bNodes? (Saturday, 10 November)
- RE: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Tuesday, 6 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: bags of axioms (Thursday, 1 November)
- Re: bags of axioms (Wednesday, 31 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Thursday, 25 October)
- RE: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: a comment on geography (was Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full) (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Monday, 22 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Monday, 22 October)
- Bnodes redux. (was: Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are) (Wednesday, 3 October)
- Re: [TF:DbE] The easiest keys there are (Tuesday, 2 October)
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-55 (owl:class) (Thursday, 20 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Example why current RDF mapping for QCRs might hurt OWL-1.1-Full (Monday, 17 December)
- OWLED, Washington, DC, April 2008 (Friday, 7 December)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] ISSUE-27 and "antisymmetric" vs. "asymmetric" object properties (Saturday, 24 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Tuesday, 6 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Monday, 5 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Sunday, 4 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Sunday, 4 November)
- Re: [OWLWG-COMMENT] Punning and the "properties for classes" use case (Friday, 2 November)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Thursday, 25 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Wednesday, 24 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: a comment on geography (Tuesday, 23 October)
- a comment on geography (was Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full) (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Tuesday, 23 October)
- Re: Some basic questions about OWL-Full (Monday, 22 October)
- Re: Defining cross products in OWL-1.1 (Friday, 12 October)
- typo in OWL 1.1 syntax (Thursday, 11 October)
Philippe Cudre-Mauroux
Phillip Lord
Pierre-Antoine Champin
Raphaël Troncy
Reto Bachmann-Gmür
Robert Stevens
RoSOC-M Workshop
Ryszard Kowalczyk
Sandro Hawke
Sean Bechhofer
Swanson, Tim
T.Heath
Tim Berners-Lee
Timothy Redmond
Uli Sattler
Ulrike Sattler
Last message date: Monday, 24 December 2007 02:50:54 UTC