- From: Matthew Pocock <matthew.pocock@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 23:31:56 +0000
- To: james.lapalme@videotron.ca
- Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
Hi James, On Friday 30 November 2007, james.lapalme@videotron.ca wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using an implementation of OWL 1.1 in TopBraid Composer. > Does the folowwing make sense : I'm not sure what you mean by making sense. Are you asking if these statements are logically consistent, or are you asking a deeper question? > > I have defined the following classes : > > Class A > Class B > Class C > Class D > > I have defined the following roles (properties) : > > role1 > role2 > > This the following make sense : > > Class is defined by > > role1 exacly 1 Class B > role2 exactly 1 Class C > role2 exactly 1 Class D So, this should mean that every instance of your class has: any number of role1 associations any number of role2 associations exactly one of the role1 associations is to an instance of class B exactly one of the role2 associations is to an instance of class C exactly one of the role3 associations is to an instance of class D Is that what you intended? > Thank you, > > James Matthew
Received on Saturday, 1 December 2007 23:32:09 UTC