Re: OWL 1.1... does this make sense

No what I intented was

class A :
 
has only 1 role1 associations
has only 2 role2 associations
exactly one of the role1 associations is to an instance of class B
exactly one of the role2 associations is to an instance of class C
exactly one of the role2 associations is to an instance of class D

thanks,

james

----- Original Message -----
From: Matthew Pocock <matthew.pocock@ncl.ac.uk>
Date: Saturday, December 1, 2007 6:31 pm
Subject: Re: OWL 1.1... does this make sense
To: james.lapalme@videotron.ca
Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org

> Hi James,
> 
> On Friday 30 November 2007, james.lapalme@videotron.ca wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using an implementation of OWL 1.1 in TopBraid Composer.
> > Does the folowwing make sense :
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean by making sense. Are you asking if 
> these statements 
> are logically consistent, or are you asking a deeper question?
> 
> >
> > I have defined the following classes :
> >
> > Class A
> > Class B
> > Class C
> > Class D
> >
> > I have defined the following roles (properties) :
> >
> > role1
> > role2
> >
> > This the following make sense :
> >
> > Class is defined by
> >
> > role1 exacly 1 Class B
> > role2 exactly 1 Class C
> > role2 exactly 1 Class D
> 
> So, this should mean that every instance of your class has:
> 
> any number of role1 associations
> any number of role2 associations
> exactly one of the role1 associations is to an instance of class B
> exactly one of the role2 associations is to an instance of class C
> exactly one of the role3 associations is to an instance of class D
> 
> Is that what you intended?
> 
> > Thank you,
> >
> > James
> 
> Matthew
>