- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <swlists-040405@champin.net>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:49:37 +0200
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- CC: Owl Dev <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
Jeremy Carroll wrote : > The option to not name nodes is necessary because many nodes do > not have any compelling name, they are essentially structural, relating > one thing with another. Using methods such as skolemization, of course, > it is possible to gensym up names (there is no name shortage). But then > if I have skolemized one way, and you have skolemized another (or > equivalently, we are talking about the same thing, except that we > gensymmed different names), we still have a lot of work to do, to > discover that we are talking about the same thing. I do see how using bnodes makes that work less difficult. Could you please develop a little further ?... Pierre-Antoine
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 09:49:49 UTC