- From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:40:57 +0200
- To: "Bijan Parsia" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: "Ian Horrocks" <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Owl Dev" <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
Many thanks, Bijan! So OWL-DEV will keep being my favourite list! ;-) Cheers, Michael >-----Original Message----- >From: Bijan Parsia [mailto:bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk] >Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 10:31 AM >To: Michael Schneider >Cc: Ian Horrocks; Owl Dev >Subject: Re: Role of 'public-webont-comments'? [WAS: Are the >acyclicity "nonstructural restrictions" too strict?] > >On Oct 17, 2007, at 8:47 AM, Michael Schneider wrote: >[snip] > >If I might jump in.... > >> Another (meta) question which might also be of interest to other's >> here in >> the list: Yesterday I have found that there is a mailing list called >> >> "public-webont-comments" >> >> which seems to have to do with the new OWL-WG, > >It was created for the old webont working group, thus has not *yet* >had anything to do with the new OWL-WG. Most working groups have a >members list and a public comments list. I don't believe the W3C team >(and certainly not the group) have decided whether to reuse public- >webont-comments, or to have a public-owl-comments (similar to public- >owl-wg) list (though I didn't check). Public-owl-dev is a general >purpose list for discussion everything owl. > >> though it already exists for >> quite a while (very low frequency). I wonder if the question, which >> I have >> put in my last post, would better be posted there instead of OWL- >> DEV. Can >> you please clarify for what kind of discussion this other group is >> intended, >> and how it should be distinguished from OWL-DEV? > >I think for a great while you are perfectly safe posting to public- >owl-dev. That's where OWL 1.1 feedback was requested to be sent, and, >as I said, I don't see that the wg has requested otherwise yet. Many >wg members actively monitor public-owl-dev (as you know) so even when >there is a more specific list, nothing should be lost by posting >here. When last call working draft calls are circulated, they will >contain directions for where to post your formal last call comments >such that they are sure to "count" in the last call review process. >Last call of *any* document is at least, I'd guess, 6 months off, so >no worries. > >I also (speaking still as me, though a me who is a member of the wg, >but not *on behalf* of the wg) hope we'll keep an "open to the world" >issues list for people to propose issues through. > >I'll also take this quick opportunity to thank you for your close and >challenging review. Your various comments and discussions are most >definitely helping make the documents stronger. > >Cheers, >Bijan. > -- Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik Karlsruhe Abtl. Information Process Engineering (IPE) Tel : +49-721-9654-726 Fax : +49-721-9654-727 Email: Michael.Schneider@fzi.de Web : http://www.fzi.de/ipe/eng/mitarbeiter.php?id=555 FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959 Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe Vorstand: Rüdiger Dillmann, Michael Flor, Jivka Ovtcharova, Rudi Studer Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 08:41:12 UTC