- From: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:26:20 +0200
- To: "Owl Dev" <public-owl-dev@w3.org>
Hi!
It just stroke me that there seem to be only Sub/Object/PropertyChains in
the current OWL-1.1 draft [1]. Does anyone know if there is a problem with
also having sub property chains of the form
SubDataPropertyOf(
SubDataPropertyChain(R1 ... Rn-1 Dn)
D )
where Dn and D are DataPropertyS (having compatible datatypes as their
ranges), while R1 ... Rn-1 are ObjectPropertyS?
With such a SubDataPropertyChain, one could for instance translate rules
like:
?x hasFather ?y AND ?y hasFamilyName ?fn
==> ?x hasFamilyName ?fn
with ?fn being an xsd:string, into an equivalent OWL axiom
SubDataPropertyOf(
SubDataPropertyChain(hasFather hasFamilyName)
hasFamilyName )
In this case, the super property whould equal the final chain property (both
'hasFamilyName').
An example for a more general rule type (the analogon of the 'uncle' rule)
would be:
?g containsUser ?u AND ?u hasUserID ?i
==> ?g containsUserWithID ?i
where ?g would stand for some user group. Here, the DataPropertyS
'hasUserID' and 'containsUserWithID' differ from each other, because they
are intended to have a different meaning.
Any ideas, if this feature has a chance to enter the family of OWL-1.1 (or
1.2 :)) axioms? Or did I overlook some fundamental issue here?
Cheers,
Michael
[1] OWL-1.1 Semantics
http://www.webont.org/owl/1.1/semantics.html#2
--
Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik Karlsruhe
Abtl. Information Process Engineering (IPE)
Tel : +49-721-9654-726
Fax : +49-721-9654-727
Email: Michael.Schneider@fzi.de
Web : http://www.fzi.de/ipe/eng/mitarbeiter.php?id=555
FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe
Vorstand: Rüdiger Dillmann, Michael Flor, Jivka Ovtcharova, Rudi Studer
Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 12:26:41 UTC