- From: Ian Horrocks <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 11:35:45 +0100
- To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- Cc: "Owl Dev" <public-owl-dev@w3.org>, "Evren Sirin" <evren@clarkparsia.com>, "Swanson, Tim" <tim.swanson@semanticarts.com>
Thanks for pointing out my error in asserting that it wasn't possible
to express Tim's rule in OWL 1.1.
Now you have pointed out the basic trick, I wonder why the set of
axioms for expressing this rule is so complex. In particular, why do
we need it to be the case that manman(x,x) <=> Man(x) -- wouldn't it
be enough that Man(x) => manman(x,x)? We could also do without
reflexivity -- we could simply use an existential restriction to
force the existence of *some* manman relation and then use (sibling
manman InverseObjectProperty(manman)) as the role chain implying
brother. This would give:
SubClassOf(Man ObjectExists(manman Thing))
SubObjectPropertyOf(SubObjectPropertyChain(sibling manman
InverseObjectProperty(manman)) brother)
Regards,
Ian
On 2 Oct 2007, at 08:52, Michael Schneider wrote:
> Hi, again!
>
> I wrote on October 01, 2007:
>
>> Many thanks again, Evren, for re-investigating!
>>
>> So I attach below a demo ontology, which exactly consists of
>> the five axioms
>> I gave in the beginning. Additionally, it contains the
>> following assertions:
>>
>> * :alice a owl:Thing .
>> * :bob a :Man .
>> * :alice :sibling :bob .
>>
>> Also, I attach below some working Jena/Pellet code, which builds an
>> inference model from this ontology, and then checks, if this
>> inference model
>> 'contains()' the triple
>>
>> :alice :brother :bob .
>>
>> The result is:
>>
>> "Exists inferred triple [alice brother bob]? true"
>>
>> And you say that I can believe in this result?
>>
>> Hey, Tim, good news, it seems to work! You get your rule in
>> OWL-1.1! :-)
>>
>> So, end of day now!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>
> A few corrections/enhancements.
>
> I now checked Evren's observation that I can remove the axiom (A2),
> which
> was specified in my original mail by:
>
> (A2) SubClassOf( ObjectMinCardinality(1 manman owl:Thing) Man )
>
> You are wright, Evren! So the set of axioms is now:
>
> (R4) SubObjectPropertyOf(SubObjectPropertyChain(sibling manman)
> brother)
> (A1) SubClassOf( Man ObjectExistsSelf(manman) )
> (A3) ObjectPropertyDomain( manman Man )
> (A4) FunctionalObjectProperty( manman )
>
> The "Deduction of (S1b')" in my original mail, where
>
> (S1b') FORALL x: ( EXISTS y: manman(x,y) ) ==> Man(x)
>
> has then to be changed the following way:
>
> * Deduction of (S1b'): Given an instance x, and an instance y,
> for which
> manman(x,y) holds. Then x is in the domain of 'manman'. And from
> axiom (A3)
> we can conclude Man(x).
>
> The original "Deduction of (A2)" gets then removed, of course.
>
> Btw, in my previous post, I had the axiom (A2) wrong in the demo
> ontology.
> Because in that ontology, I had accidentally made the minCardinality
> restriction a QCR restricted to class Man, instead of owl:Thing. Not a
> dangerous bug, but now the complete axiom has vanished, anyway. :-)
>
> There was also a confusing typo in the javadoc of the demo code,
> where the
> string for the rule contained the predicate "Man" with variable "x"
> instead
> of "y".
>
> I attach the corrected/enhanced versions of the ontology and the
> demo code
> below.
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
> ===== Ontology "timsrule.owl" (no axiom (A2) anymore) =============
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <rdf:RDF
> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
> xmlns="http://example.org/timsrule.owl#"
> xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
> xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
> xmlns:owl11="http://www.w3.org/2006/12/owl11#"
> xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
> xml:base="http://example.org/timsrule.owl">
> <owl:Ontology rdf:about="">
> <rdfs:comment>Encoding of the rule
> [sibling(x,y)^Man(y)->brother(x,y)] in OWL-1.1</rdfs:comment>
> <owl:versionInfo rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/
> XMLSchema#string"
>> Created with TopBraid Composer</owl:versionInfo>
> </owl:Ontology>
> <owl:Class rdf:ID="Man">
> <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/
> owl#Thing"/>
> <rdfs:subClassOf>
> <owl11:SelfRestriction>
> <owl:onProperty>
> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="manman"/>
> </owl:onProperty>
> </owl11:SelfRestriction>
> </rdfs:subClassOf>
> </owl:Class>
> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="#manman">
> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#Man"/>
> <rdf:type
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#FunctionalProperty"/>
> </owl:ObjectProperty>
> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="sibling"/>
> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:ID="brother"/>
> <rdf:List rdf:ID="subRoleChain">
> <rdf:first rdf:resource="#sibling"/>
> <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Collection">
> <owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="#manman"/>
> </rdf:rest>
> <rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="#brother"/>
> </rdf:List>
> <owl:Thing rdf:ID="alice">
> <sibling>
> <Man rdf:ID="bob"/>
> </sibling>
> </owl:Thing>
> </rdf:RDF>
>
> <!-- Created with TopBraid Composer -->
>
> ===== Democode (corrected typo in class docu) =====================
>
> // Note: need a current version of Pellet (>= 1.5)
>
> import org.mindswap.pellet.jena.PelletReasonerFactory;
> import com.hp.hpl.jena.ontology.OntModel;
> import com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.model.ModelFactory;
> import com.hp.hpl.jena.rdf.model.ResourceFactory;
>
> import java.io.FileInputStream;
>
> /**
> * Rule [sibling(x,y) AND Man(y) ==> brother(x,y)] in OWL-1.1
> * @author Michael Schneider (m_schnei@gmx.de)
> */
> public class TimsRuleDemo {
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> String ONT_FILENAME = "timsrule.owl"; // put in project-
> toplevel
> String BASE_URI = "http://example.org/timsrule.owl";
> try {
> OntModel ontModel =
> ModelFactory.createOntologyModel(PelletReasonerFactory.THE_SPEC);
> ontModel.read(new FileInputStream(ONT_FILENAME),
> BASE_URI);
> System.out.println("Exists inferred triple [alice
> brother bob]?
> " +
> ontModel.contains(
>
> ResourceFactory.createResource(BASE_URI+"#alice"),
> ResourceFactory.createProperty(BASE_URI,
> "#brother"),
> ResourceFactory.createResource(BASE_URI
> +"#bob")
> )
> );
> } catch (Throwable e) {
> e.printStackTrace();
> }
> }
> }
>
> ===================================================================
>
> --
> Dipl.-Inform. Michael Schneider
> FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik Karlsruhe
> Abtl. Information Process Engineering (IPE)
> Tel : +49-721-9654-726
> Fax : +49-721-9654-727
> Email: Michael.Schneider@fzi.de
> Web : http://www.fzi.de/ipe/eng/mitarbeiter.php?id=555
>
> FZI Forschungszentrum Informatik an der Universität Karlsruhe
> Haid-und-Neu-Str. 10-14, D-76131 Karlsruhe
> Tel.: +49-721-9654-0, Fax: +49-721-9654-959
> Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
> Az: 14-0563.1 Regierungspräsidium Karlsruhe
> Vorstand: Rüdiger Dillmann, Michael Flor, Jivka Ovtcharova, Rudi
> Studer
> Vorsitzender des Kuratoriums: Ministerialdirigent Günther Leßnerkraus
Received on Saturday, 6 October 2007 10:36:14 UTC