- From: Matthew Pocock <matthew.pocock@ncl.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 10:43:50 +0000
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
On Thursday 01 November 2007, Bijan Parsia wrote: > Matthew, > > Sorry a bit swamped, but two questions: > > 1) How much would be solved by lifting the URI restriction on the > ontology element? I think there's already an issue about that. That would remove the symptom, and modulo philosophers getting ideas about what Ontology is meant to represent (other than a bag of axioms), would solve the problem. > 2) A while back, I played around with XPointer extensions that could > encode SPARQL like queries (or DIG like queries). Esp. with a > reliably fixed source document, this could give you a canonical URI > for the subset. A simple version would be to add IDs to all your > axioms and use normalish XPointer. Axioms with IDs? Now there's a thought :) Dropping the URI requirement from Ontology, and the toolkits following suit would work for me. Matthew > > Cheers, > Bijan.
Received on Monday, 5 November 2007 10:44:14 UTC