Monday, 30 April 2012
- Re: Missing requirment - content format/type
- RE: Missing requirment - content format/type
- Re: Missing requirment - content format/type
- idValue requirement updated
- Re: Missing requirment - content format/type
- Re: XPath Version
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-7 (XPath Version): Sue of Xpath 2.0 [MLW-LT Standard Draft]
- [all] scribing of the call on Friday May 4, 2012
- preserveSpace requirement updated
- RE: XPath Version
- XPath Version
- Missing requirment - content format/type
- Re: [issue 3] How to specify the entity type with RDFa ?
- Re: [issue 3] How to specify the entity type with RDFa ?
- RE: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
Sunday, 29 April 2012
- Re: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- Re: [ACTION-78]Consider consolidation of localeSpecificContent and droprule
Saturday, 28 April 2012
- [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger
- Re: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- [ACTION-80] consider consolidation of mtDisambiguationData, namedEntity, terminology and textAnalyticsAnnotation
Friday, 27 April 2012
- [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger,,State:
- Re: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- [ACTION-78]Consider consolidation of localeSpecificContent and droprule
- Re: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- Re: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- [ISSUE-4] Naming of standard
- Re: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- RE: [all] Discussion on proposed metadata categories: approvalStatus
- RE: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- Re: [issue 3] What ontology should describe the metadata values (entity types)
- Re: [issue 3] What ontology should describe the metadata values (entity types)
- Re: [all] Discussion on proposed metadata categories: approvalStatus
- Let's drop RDFa in the requirements !
- [issue 3] How to specify the entity type with RDFa ?
- [issue 3] How to specify the entity type
- [issue 3] What ontology should describe the metadata values (entity types)
- Re: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: just a broken link
- just a broken link
- Re: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- MLW-LT: On intersections with other recommendations
Thursday, 26 April 2012
- Re: [all] Discussion on proposed metadata categories: approvalStatus
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: On why we should use data-its-* if we want to use prefixed attributes for HTML5
- On why we should use data-its-* if we want to use prefixed attributes for HTML5
- RE: [all] Discussion on proposed metadata categories: approvalStatus
- Re: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- RE: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- Re: [ACTION-66] Pick up questionnaire content and present in tabular form. Are input addressed by data cats?
- Re: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- [ACTION-66] Pick up questionnaire content and present in tabular form. Are input addressed by data cats?
- [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements
- [ACTION-22] Complete final formatting and sanity check before publishing as a Technical Report
- [ACTION-68] Identify and apply naming to different tools (content editor, CAT tool, review tool) produce common terminology for use in our work
- Re: [all] Agenda for WG call, Thursday 26th April 2012- N.B. NEW START TIME
- Re: [all] Discussion on proposed metadata categories: approvalStatus
- Re: [all] Discussion on proposed metadata categories: approvalStatus
Wednesday, 25 April 2012
Tuesday, 24 April 2012
Monday, 23 April 2012
- Re: Parameters for rules?
- RE: Parameters for rules?
- Re: [all] Proposed revision to Thursday Meeting slot time to 14.00 UTC
- [all] Proposed revision to Thursday Meeting slot time to 14.00 UTC
Sunday, 22 April 2012
Friday, 20 April 2012
- RE: Parameters for rules?
- Re: Parameters for rules?
- Parameters for rules?
- Fwd: [all] Agenda for WG call, Friday 20th April 2012
Thursday, 19 April 2012
- Re: [action 63] naming our standard
- RE: [action 63] naming our standard
- Re: [action 63] naming our standard
- Re: [action 63] naming our standard
- RE: [action 63] naming our standard
- Re: [action 63] naming our standard
- Re: [action 63] naming our standard
- Re: [action 63] naming our standard
- [action 63] naming our standard
- [all] Agenda for WG call, Friday 20th April 2012
Wednesday, 18 April 2012
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Scribe Cheat Sheet for use during conference calls
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- [action-49] Talk to R12a on best practices for internationalisation and contributions WG can make to this.
- FW: [Action-23] Work with Ryan King to to elaborate on need for pr=,ioirty tagging of source content
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
Tuesday, 17 April 2012
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- AW: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- RE: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Re: Practical question: elements or attributes?
- Updated process/category correlation chart
- Practical question: elements or attributes?
Monday, 16 April 2012
- Re: confidentiality data category
- confidentiality data category
- Organizing the requirements
- Re: [ACTION-50]: Explain process triggers in more detail
- Re: [ACTION-50]: Explain process triggers in more detail
- Re: [ACTION-50]: Explain process triggers in more detail
- RE: [ACTION-50]: Explain process triggers in more detail
- RE: [ACTION-50]: Explain process triggers in more detail
- Re: [terminology resource] expand this category?
Friday, 13 April 2012
- Re: [terminology resource] expand this category?
- RE: [terminology resource] expand this category?
- RE: [ACTION-50]: Explain process triggers in more detail
- Re: [terminology resource] expand this category?
- RE: [terminology resource] expand this category?
- [terminology resource] expand this category?
- [ACTION-50]: Explain process triggers in more detail
- Additional workflow steps
Thursday, 12 April 2012
- Re: URL for chart of workflow and metadata
- Re: Missing action items
- RE: Missing action items
- Re: URL for chart of workflow and metadata
- Re: Question on legal status
- [all] Agenda for WG call, Thursday 12th April 2012
- Reminder to update ownership; Thank you to Yves and Tadej
Wednesday, 11 April 2012
- Assigned owners to items
- Missing action items
- RE: Question on approval status
- CORRECTION: URL for chart of workflow and metadata
- URL for chart of workflow and metadata
- Question on legal status
- Question on approval status
Tuesday, 10 April 2012
Friday, 6 April 2012
- RE: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
- RE: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
- Re: [ACTION-42]: Provide some input on the scripting issue
Thursday, 5 April 2012
- RE: [ACTION-14]: Pedro to address cache and MT disambiguation with Arle
- [all] Agenda for Friday meeting April 6th 2012
- RE: [ACTION-14]: Pedro to address cache and MT disambiguation with Arle
- RE: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
- RE: [ACTION-14]: Pedro to address cache and MT disambiguation with Arle
- Re: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
- RE: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
- RE: [ACTION-14]: Pedro to address cache and MT disambiguation with Arle
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-6: Process State [MLW-LT Requirements Document]
- Re: AW: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
- AW: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
- Re: [ACTION-20] Gather CMS user and developer perspective requirements from MLW-LT, including from drupal con
- Re: [ACTION-42]: Provide some input on the scripting issue
- Re: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
- RE: [ACTION-14]: Pedro to address cache and MT disambiguation with Arle
- [ACTION-20] Gather CMS user and developer perspective requirements from MLW-LT, including from drupal con
- RE: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
- AW: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
- Re: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
- AW: MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
Wednesday, 4 April 2012
- [ACTION-14]: Pedro to address cache and MT disambiguation with Arle
- MLW-LT Data categorie > process state
- [ACTION-42]: Provide some input on the scripting issue
Tuesday, 3 April 2012
- Re: [ACTION-17] Add section on confidence score on NLP (e.g. TA and MT) component output
- [ACTION-17] Add section on confidence score on NLP (e.g. TA and MT) component output
- Quality data categories